mistakes crept in in the Updating Registry (for brevity "UDR") and that too, after obtaining report from the third respondent.
18. The learned ... rectify the mistakes committed prior to UDR and therefore, it cannot be blindly stated that the second respondent is not empowered to pass the impugned
mistakes crept in in the Updating Registry (for brevity "UDR") and that too, after obtaining report from the third respondent.
18. The learned ... rectify the mistakes committed prior to UDR and therefore, it cannot be blindly stated that the second respondent is not empowered to pass the impugned
2013
under Section 279 , 337 and 338 of IPC and UDR No.19/2013
under Section 174 of CRPC dated 17.07.2013, against the
Respondents Lorry ... 5541/2012 have produced Ex.P.15 UDR
No.19/2013, Ex.P.16 Complaint, Ex.P.17 Postmortem Report,
Ex.P.18 Inquest
hospital authorities,
who in turn have registered the case in UDR No.37/1999
6
under Section 174 of Cr.P.C; on the next ... report of UDR
No.37/1998. Subsequently, the documents with regard to
registration of UDR and conducting inquest mahazar
proceedings were transferred to the Rural
owner of the said property bearing S.No.91. The
village pre UDR, "A" register of the Revenue Department till recently bore ... referred as
belonging to the Government and that under updating Registering Scheme (UDR)
the said S.No.91 was subdivided into
caused on 23.7.2009. The postmortem report
dated 23.7.2009 and the subsequent UDR report
suggests no involvement of the offending vehicle. The
FIR which is registered ... accidental
injuries. FIR No.231/2009 on the basis of UDR report
was registered under Section 174 of Criminal Procedure
Code. The FIR is marked
volumes, (b).the Filed Map Register two in numbers prepared during UDR
pertaining to Survey Nos.601 to 700; and another book pertaining to Survey ... able to see that the same has been prepared pursuant to UDR Scheme on
25.03.1984 wherein petitioner's holding in respect of land
that the plaintiff owns
property only in Survey No.1380/2. During UDR proceedings, he had
fraudulently included his name in the patta. The defendants ... below have filed to appreciate that Ex.A3 and
A4 the UDR pattas given to the plaintiff and documents
year
1975 reflects the name of the private respondents. Only during UDR
proceedings, the name of Chairman Nadar got included in the patta. Hence ... were standing in the name of the said Chairman Nadar.
Only during UDR proceedings, erroneously the name of Chairman Nadar
got included in the patta
permitted to occupy. The mother of
the appellants/first defendant obtained UDR Patta in her name in the absence
of the first plaintiff/father ... Office
and produced Rental Agreements and receipts to substantiate the said case.
UDR Patta in respect of 4th lot was erroneously issued to the first
