submit that the material witnesses
are not examined. At the first instance UDR was
registered and thereafter, based on the voluntary
statements, weapons were recovered ... instance of the
accused persons. The Court below has committed an error
in acquitting the accused persons.
7. Per-contra, learned counsel for respondent
question of law whether the
Workmen's Compensation Commissioner committed an
error in not considering the materials on record. My
answer would ... been marked as Ex.P.2 and case has been
registered in UDR No.5/2008. Admittedly she is not an eye
witness
Mr E S Praveen Kumar vs State Of Karnataka on 19 May, 2022
Author: K
The Registrar General vs Mallika @ Lakshmi @ Shivamogga Kempamma on 2 August, 2012
Author: D V
namely A8-VAO, A9-Revenue Inspector, A10-Regional Deputy
Tahsildar. The original UDR patta of the 2nd respondent's wife and his
sister ... instead of further investigation, it is typed as reinvestigation.
Except for typographical error, no reinvestigation was conducted, it was
only further investigation
State Of Karnataka By vs Chandrashekara Babu @ Chandrashekara on 11 October, 2019
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
Revathy vs State Rep. By on 28 August, 2020
Author: R.Pongiappan
Bench: R.Pongiappan
State Of Karnataka vs D C Shivaramu S/O Late Chikkamaraiah on 13 December, 2012
Narayana vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2008
Author: V.Jagannathan
Bench: V
N Ramaiah S/O Late Narayanappa vs State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009
Cri
