time limit for seeking any correction of any
errors that has crept in during UDR survey.
8.The learned Counsel for the petitioner ... concern the request of the
petitioners for correction of the errors in the UDR records. The
limitation prescribed under G.O.(Ms).No.714, dated
time limit for seeking any correction of any
errors that has crept in during UDR survey.
8.The learned Counsel for the petitioner ... concern the request of the
petitioners for correction of the errors in the UDR records. The
limitation prescribed under G.O.(Ms).No.714, dated
issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to rectify the
error in UDR as east to west as 9.6 metre instead of 10.6 metre ... petitioner that his representation dated
08.06.2018 seeking to rectify the error in UDR, has not been considered by
the second respondent till date and therefore
Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider and
rectify the error crept in the UDR anomaly by incorporating as “irrigation
channel”, after replacing the word ... direct the first
respondent to consider and rectify the error crept in the UDR anomaly by
incorporating as “irrigation channel”, after replacing the word “foot
Mandamus, directing the first respondent to consider and
rectify the error crept in the UDR anomaly by incorporating as “irrigation
channel”, after replacing the word ... direct the first
respondent to consider and rectify the error crept in the UDR anomaly by
incorporating as “irrigation channel”, after replacing the word “foot
father.
The fourth respondent claimed that due to the error crept in the UDR Proceedings, his
mother's name was deleted from the patta ... Petitioner to
approach the second respondent to rectify the error crept during UDR Proceeding,
which is now under challenge in this Writ Petition
issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondent to rectify the
error in UDR in respect of survey Number 352/1 situated at Kannanur Village ... petitioner that his representation dated
08.06.2018 seeking to rectify the error crept-in UDR, in respect of the
property comprised in Survey
28881/2017/aa3 dated 10.09.2018 to rectify the error
committed while UDR and made correction in the revenue records of
petitioner's land ... 28881/2017/aa3 dated 10.09.2018 and to rectify the error
committed while granting UDR patta and make correction in the
revenue records
Applicant cannot assert any right. According to the Review Applicant, during the UDR updation of records, the classification of the lands in question has been ... records. the first respondent has concluded that there was no error during the UDR updation proceedings and the classification of the land continued to remain
title of the defendants, but on certain errors said
to have crept in, in the UDR scheme. Here, the first Appellate Court has
essentially relied
