Revenue
Department (ULC), Secretariat,
Hyderabad and others
... Respondents
COMMON ORDER
These writ petitions arise under the provisions of ULC Act, 1976 .
All the above writ ... Repeal Act came into force on 27.03.2008. After Repeal Act came into
force all the proceedings under the Act have got abated. The possession
Revenue
Department (ULC), Secretariat,
Hyderabad and others
... Respondents
COMMON ORDER
These writ petitions arise under the provisions of ULC Act, 1976 .
All the above writ ... Repeal Act came into force on 27.03.2008. After Repeal Act came into
force all the proceedings under the Act have got abated. The possession
Revenue
Department (ULC), Secretariat,
Hyderabad and others
... Respondents
COMMON ORDER
These writ petitions arise under the provisions of ULC Act, 1976 .
All the above writ ... Repeal Act came into force on 27.03.2008. After Repeal Act came into
force all the proceedings under the Act have got abated. The possession
Revenue
Department (ULC), Secretariat,
Hyderabad and others
... Respondents
COMMON ORDER
These writ petitions arise under the provisions of ULC Act, 1976 .
All the above writ ... Repeal Act came into force on 27.03.2008. After Repeal Act came into
force all the proceedings under the Act have got abated. The possession
Revenue
Department (ULC), Secretariat,
Hyderabad and others
... Respondents
COMMON ORDER
These writ petitions arise under the provisions of ULC Act, 1976 .
All the above writ ... Repeal Act came into force on 27.03.2008. After Repeal Act came into
force all the proceedings under the Act have got abated. The possession
petitioner company instituted an appeal under section 33 of
the ULC Act against the orders issued by the 2nd respondent dated
03.04.2004. The Chief Commissioner ... concerned Deputy Collector or
Tahsildar of Marripalem Village.
(vi) The ULC Act i.e., Act, 33 of 1976 stood repealed by the Urban Land
(Ceiling
petitioner company instituted an appeal under section 33 of
the ULC Act against the orders issued by the 2nd respondent dated
03.04.2004. The Chief Commissioner ... concerned Deputy Collector or
Tahsildar of Marripalem Village.
(vi) The ULC Act i.e., Act, 33 of 1976 stood repealed by the Urban Land
(Ceiling
petitioner company instituted an appeal under section 33 of
the ULC Act against the orders issued by the 2nd respondent dated
03.04.2004. The Chief Commissioner ... concerned Deputy Collector or
Tahsildar of Marripalem Village.
(vi) The ULC Act i.e., Act, 33 of 1976 stood repealed by the Urban Land
(Ceiling
petitioner or her vendors was not disturbed and the said ULC Act, 1976 was
repealed by the ULC Repeal Act, 1999 which was adopted ... treated as ULC land. Even in the light of the
above said decisions, extension of provisions of the ULC Act, 1976 is not
sustainable under
petitioner or her vendors was not disturbed and the said ULC Act, 1976 was
repealed by the ULC Repeal Act, 1999 which was adopted ... treated as ULC land. Even in the light of the
above said decisions, extension of provisions of the ULC Act, 1976 is not
sustainable under
