Bench of India in Umadevi 's case (1 supra).
The decision given in the case of Umadevi has been clarified ... Umadevi 's case (1 supra) itself. The subsequent clarification
in the case of M.L. Kesari 's case (2 supra) carries the issue
reported
in State of Karnataka v. Umadevi . For better understanding, Paragraph
No.53 of the Judgment in Umadevi case is extracted hereunder ... case and paragraphs 7 to 10 in the judgment in
M.L. Kesari 's case, would squarely be applicable to the case
reported
in State of Karnataka v. Umadevi . For better understanding, Paragraph
No.53 of the Judgment in Umadevi case is extracted hereunder ... case and paragraphs 7 to 10 in the judgment in
M.L. Kesari 's case, would squarely be applicable to the case
reported
in State of Karnataka v. Umadevi . For better understanding, Paragraph
No.53 of the Judgment in Umadevi case is extracted hereunder ... case and paragraphs 7 to 10 in the judgment in
M.L. Kesari 's case, would squarely be applicable to the case
reported
in State of Karnataka v. Umadevi . For better understanding, Paragraph
No.53 of the Judgment in Umadevi case is extracted hereunder ... case and paragraphs 7 to 10 in the judgment in
M.L. Kesari 's case, would squarely be applicable to the case
pass appropriate orders in terms of the Judgment referred
above ( Umadevi 's case), within a period of 10 weeks from the
date of receipt ... case, the authorities considered the ratio laid
down in Piara Singh 's case which was much prior to
Umadevi 's case. The order
pass appropriate orders in terms of the Judgment referred
above ( Umadevi 's case), within a period of 10 weeks from the
date of receipt ... case, the authorities considered the ratio laid
down in Piara Singh 's case which was much prior to
Umadevi 's case. The order
contract
employees working in the Corporation. The Judgment rendered in
Umadevi 's case further was explained in State of Karnataka v. L
Kesari (supra ... true effect of the direction
at paragraph 53 of Judgment in Umadevi case is that all persons who
have worked for more than 10 years
wherein the Hon'ble Division Bench
discussed Umadevi 's case and held, are not entitled to benefit of
regularization only for the reason ... true effect of the direction at paragraph 53
of judgment in Umadevi case is that all persons who have worked for more
than 10 years
wherein the Hon'ble Division Bench
discussed Umadevi 's case and held, are not entitled to benefit of
regularization only for the reason ... true effect of the direction at paragraph 53
of judgment in Umadevi case is that all persons who have worked for more
than 10 years
