Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19479 (4.25 seconds)

Natubhai Manilal Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 30 January, 2025

since many years. The petitioners therefore made application seeking regularization of un-authorized construction. The said application was originally allowed and subsequently cancelled ... aside. (vi) Learned advocate further submitted that in relation to un- authorized construction as alleged by Municipal Corporation, the petitioners had preferred application seeking regularization
Gujarat High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Himachal Pradesh Town and Country Planning Act, 1977

this section is rendered totally ineffective for further vertical construction in future; (h) un-authorized constructions carried out on the area and pockets kept ... Where permission has not been taken for development i.e. total un-authorized construction. @ Rs. 1000/- per M2 @ Rs. 500/- per M2 For the purpose
State of Himachal Pradesh - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 113

Gangumal vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 22 April, 2009

Punjab Municipal Corporation Act directing demolition of the un-authorized construction and ultimately demolition order was issued. Appeal preferred by the respondent was allowed, however ... meanwhile, un-authorized construction was demolished. In these circumstances, the Additional District Judge ordered that the parties are therefore relegated to the position
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - D Mishra - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next