Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.02 seconds)

Jalandhar Development Authority vs Krishna on 7 March, 2024

plot falls in the residential land use Zone. It was proposed by the DTP that before considering the plot under the Regularization of unauthorized plot ... considered, whereby it was proposed that the unapproved colony is prior to 19.03.2018, as such the plot can be considered for regularization for residential purpose
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Executive Office vs Suman Kumar on 13 April, 2018

asking to stop the construction work on the said plot on the ground that plot falls under Sukhija Colony, which has been declared as unauthorized ... site plan would be considered as unapproved. Ex.C-4 is sale deed of this plot in favour of complainants in Sukhija Colony. The complainants
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pspcl vs Manjit Kaur on 23 April, 2015

ground that the plot of the complainant was situated in an unapproved colony i.e. Manor Estate. The Chief Administrator, Amritsar Development Authority, vide ... that the unauthorized promoters and the plot holders were required to deposit various amounts for regularization of their plot/colony on account of one time
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Consumer Protection Council, ... vs The Branch Manager State Bank Of India ... on 16 September, 2011

lawyers, obtained opinion, sanctioned loan, and on that basis alone, a plot was purchased, which is proved to be a public utility property, thereby depriving ... opposed vehemently.   7. Admittedly, the complainant had purchased a plot, in an approved layout, or unapproved layout, which is not clear, in Srirangam, after obtaining
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next