Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 178 (0.52 seconds)

U V Padmavathi vs M/O Railways on 16 October, 2020

that the applicant was unauthorisedly absent for 958 days though the charge sheet charges the deceased employee for unauthorised absence of only 309 days. Therefore ... duty, such absence cannot be held to be willful. Absence from duty without any application or prior permission may amount to unauthorised absence
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M V Rama Manohara Rao vs M/O Railways on 25 June, 2019

respondents organisation was removed from service on 11.10.1993 for unauthorised absence during the period 31.5.1990 to 4.7.1995. Consequent to appeal and revision application being rejected ... revision authority have upheld the penalty of removal for unauthorised absence of around 5 years. 6. Heard both the counsel and perused the relevant material
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S Rajaiah vs M/O Railways on 27 August, 2019

proceeded with the available records. Removal from service on grounds of unauthorised absence does not bar him from being eligible to be granted compassionate allowance ... which clearly states that applicant was removed from service for unauthorised absence. Even in the service record of the applicant, entry to the effect
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S Ramesh Babu vs M/O Railways on 25 February, 2020

grade of Junior Engineer (in short "JE"), for unauthorised absence, vide disciplinary authority Memo dated 25.02.2013, which was upheld by the Appellate authority ... while working as SSE in the respondents organisation was proceeded for unauthorised absence on disciplinary grounds vide Charge Memo dated 18.10.2011 and after due inquiry
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M A Jabbar vs D/O Post on 24 January, 2020

absence cannot be held to be wilful. Absence from duty without any application or prior 5 OA 21/598/2014 permission may amount to unauthorised ... absence from duty is made, the disciplinary authority is required to prove that the absence is wilful, in the absence of such finding, the absence
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Shri B. Venkateshwar vs Union Of India on 10 September, 2008

basis. The third respondent issued charge memo to the applicant alleging unauthorised absence from duty from 13.12.99 to 2 28.3.2000. Even prior to the said ... view of the fact that for the same period of alleged unauthorised absence, leave was already sanctioned by the competent authority. The applicant submitted
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

P. Veeraswamy vs The Chief Electrical Loco Engineer, The ... on 12 June, 2007

applicant and the applicant submitted his explanation on 11.09.2004 admitting his unauthorised absence, but pleading that on account of sickness of his wife he could ... applicant submitted his representation stating that he has already admitted his unauthorised absence and he has already submitted his explanation to the earlier charge sheet
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next