been accepted. The Corporation on 12.8.94 took a decision to remove unauthorised construction. On these facts, the suit was filed. It was further averred that ... plaintiff on 8.11.93, calling upon the plaintiff to stop the unauthorised construction. Police Inspector of Navrangpura Police Station was also requested in this behalf. Despite
given that within a period of three days after removal of unauthorised construction, the Corporation should be informed failing which at the cost ... petitioners is unauthorised and against the building bye-laws and regulations. Direction was given that the applicants first demolish unauthorised construction. However, having not done
illegal construction and/or illegal use of the construction. It is further pointed out that if the construction is illegal or unauthorised, the respondent Corporation ... floor to 5th floor are being used as office unauthorisedly by making unauthorised construction. No suit is pending. It is also stated that the builder
builder/developer disclosed true facts about irregularities, illegalities and unauthorised construction, the shopkeepers and office owners in the building would not have parted with money ... Nita International that the builder has carried out illegal and unauthorised construction and has duped the innocent persons and therefore they must be awarded adequate
under:
3.1 The issue involved is in relation to unauthorised
construction on a residential Plot No. 42 B, on revenue survey ... Khokhar. It was case of petitioner's neighbour
that some unauthorised construction was made in 140 sq. yards
of land which belongs
remove him from
unauthorised occupation of the premises of the
panchayat .
He pointed out that if any unauthorised construction or obstruction
or encroachment from panchayat ... appears that the plaintiff
has unauthorisedly encroached upon the panchayat land and has put
up illegal and unauthorised construction on the panchayat land
upon the land meant for passage. It was an illegal and unauthorised construction made by the plaintiffs-petitioners. A notice under Section ... shop made illegally and unauthorised. It is not gainsay how so of long period an illegal and unauthorised construction is allowed to stand or continue
Corporation. As the respondent-Corporation had decided to remove the unauthorised construction, the occupiers have, therefore, filed the aforesaid Civil Suit ... notice dated 16-10-1987, with the sketch of the unauthorised construction attached thereto was issued under Section
Respondent No. 2, Municipal Commissioner of Ahmedabad by which unauthorised construction made as shown in the notice under Section 260(1) of the Bombay Provincial ... petitioner was asked to remove the unauthorised construction by an order made under Section 260(2) of the said Act. Thereupon, Civil Suit
purpose of challenging the constitutional validity of the Gujarat Regularisation of Unauthorised Development Act, 2001 , can, succeed only in the backdrop of the facts ... public objections before regularisation of the unauthorised development and constructions. It is, therefore, vehemently pleaded that regularisation of unauthorised constructions is not actuated by profit
