held that the same was based on unchallenged testimony of witnesses and unrebutted
record and, therefore, it cannot be called perverse or based
pertinent to note that testimony of both these witnesses
regarding accused having relation with Surubhi goes unrebutted,
unchallenged and unshattered as the same ... relationship with Nitin is of no consequence in view of the
unchallenged testimony of PW 3 Amit Verma and PW 8 Arun Kumar
Mittal
pertinent to note that testimony of both these witnesses
regarding accused having relation with Surubhi goes unrebutted,
unchallenged and unshattered as the same ... relationship with Nitin is of no consequence in view of the
unchallenged testimony of PW 3 Amit Verma and PW 8 Arun Kumar
Mittal
been cross-examined by the
appellants. Under the circumstances, there is unchallenged testimony
of Dr. Romesh Lal PW17, Head Constable Dharam Singh, Incharge ... police in hospital goes unchallenged in the absence of
any cross-examination in these regards. As such, the testimony of PW
1 Parminder Singh finds
dying declaration made by the deceased
goes un-rebutted and unchallenged. Their testimony also find
corroboration from the medical evidence. Moreover, the blood
stained clothes ... additionally, non cross-examination of the doctor in this regard
unchallenged testimony of PW2 and PW3 regarding the dying
declaration made by deceased to them
that the deceased committed suicide
within seven years of marriage. From the testimony of PW1, PW2
and PW3, it is proved that the deceased ... such, certain variations have crept in her testimony.
But on material aspects, her testimony goes unchallenged and there is
no reason to disbelieve the same
Prabhat Singh vs State on 8 July, 2014
Author: Sunita Gupta
Bench: Kailash Gambhir , Sunita
talking to
her about the shop. This part of his testimony also goes unchallenged
as he was not cross-examined in this regard. As such ... talking to her regarding the shop. This
part of his testimony goes unchallenged, unrebutted and unshattered
as the same has not been assailed
that
the deceased committed suicide within seven years of marriage. From the
testimony of PW1 and PW2, it is proved that the deceased was subjected ... therefore, certain variations have crept in their
testimony. But on material aspects, their testimony goes unchallenged and
Crl.A.1213/2013 Page
bribe and the bill from the appellant. Despite cross-examination, his
testimony could not be assailed. He has no axe to grind against the
accused ... became
perplexed and also tendered apology, which part of his testimony
goes unchallenged as no cross-examination was effected on this point.
This conduct