cheque from the
accused. From which it discloses, he took the undated cheque as
security for the alleged lent of loan. Even he not satisfactorily ... realized
cheque amount from the complaint. Likewise, if at all, the accused gave
the questioned cheque at Ex.P1 undated on 12.12.2016, on that
alleged huge
amount with him and hence he issued undated cheque of
Rs.2 lakhs to the complainant. These suggestions have
been specifically denied ... Complainant.
Further it has been suggested that, the complainant has
misutilized undated cheque and for wrongful gain has filed
this complaint. This suggestion was also
prima facie, it was the petitioners who
had handed over the undated cheque for a certain amount
to the respondent in terms of a contract ... between the
parties. Since an undated cheque cannot be encashed, it
can only mean that the petitioners had authorized the
complainant to enter an appropriate
prima facie, it was the petitioners who had
handed over the undated cheque for a certain amount to the
respondent in terms of a contract ... between the parties. Since an
undated cheque cannot be encashed, it can only mean that the
petitioners had authorized the complainant to enter an appropriate
prima facie, it was the
petitioners who had handed over the undated
cheque for a certain amount to the respondent
in terms of a contract ... between the parties.
Since an undated cheque cannot be encashed,
it can only mean that the petitioners had
authorized the complainant to enter an
appropriate
prima facie, it was the petitioners
who had handed over the undated cheque for a
certain amount to the respondent in terms of a
contract ... between the parties. Since an undated cheque
cannot be encashed, it can only mean that the petitioners
had authorized the complainant to enter an appropriate
prima facie, it was the petitioners who had handed
over the undated cheque for a certain amount to the respondent in
terms of a contract ... between the parties. Since an undated cheque
cannot be encashed, it can only mean that the petitioners had
authorized the complainant to enter an appropriate
prima facie, it was the petitioners who had
handed over the undated cheque for a certain amount to the
respondent in terms of a contract ... between the parties. Since an
undated cheque cannot be encashed, it can only mean that the
petitioners had authorized the complainant to enter an
appropriate
prima facie, it was the petitioners who had handed over
the undated cheque for a certain amount to the respondent in terms of a
contract ... between the parties. Since an undated cheque cannot be encashed, it
can only mean that the petitioners had authorized the complainant to enter an
appropriate
prima facie, it was the petitioners who had handed
over the undated cheque for a certain amount to the respondent in
terms of a contract ... between the parties. Since an undated cheque
cannot be encashed, it can only mean that the petitioners had
authorized the complainant to enter an appropriate
