lakhs.
4.2 The petitioner no.1 had issued four undated cheques bearing no.997635,
997637, 997638 and 997639 drawn on State Bank of India, Bhikaji ... respondent no 2 was in possession of the four undated cheques
issued on behalf of the petitioner no 1. However the respondent no 2
presented
beyond Rs. 50 lakhs.
4.2 The petitioner no1 had issued four undated cheques bearing no.997635,
997637, 997638 and 997639 drawn on State Bank ... respondent no 2 was in possession of the four undated cheques
issued on behalf of the petitioner no 1. However the respondent no 2
presented
said cheques at Ex.P1 and 2 are issued by
the accused which are post dated cheques and the said
cheques are towards ... admitted that the cheques are pertaining to SBI bank and no
hurdle to produce 12 cheques and also that the cheques
issued by the accused
more undated cheques bearing no. 442762 and 442763
in the sum of Rs. 5,00,000/ each. The Ld.Counsel for the
Accused has emphasized ... cheques
issued by the Accused were undated meaning thereby that
the version of the Accused pertaining to undated cheques
has been proved. That the Accused
more undated cheques bearing no.
442762 and 442763 in the sum of Rs. 5,00,000/ each. The
Ld.Counsel for the Accused has emphasized ... cheques issued by the Accused were
undated meaning thereby that the version of the Accused
pertaining to undated cheques has been proved. That the
Accused
Gadhia Vs. Vareshwar Kumar Mehta
Rs.12,00,000/. Two more undated cheques bearing ... cheques issued by the Accused were
undated meaning thereby that the version of the Accused
pertaining to undated cheques has been proved. That the
Accused
more undated cheques bearing no.
442762 and 442763 in the sum of Rs. 5,00,000/ each. The
Ld.Counsel for the Accused has emphasized ... cheques issued by the Accused were
undated meaning thereby that the version of the Accused
pertaining to undated cheques has been proved. That the
Accused
representative of the plaintiff company managed to take
the said undated cheques in question from the defendant.
Moreover, the plaintiff company without fulfulling its
commitment ... time of placing
of purchase order, who taken these cheques alongwith
other cheques (all were undated) on the pretext of
completion of his sales target
blank undated cheques
to the complainant as security cheques for future transactions on
30.12.2013. It is stated that after reviewing all the undated/post-dated ... raised quality issues, the complainant had
mischievously filled the blank undated cheques and had presented the
same for encashment. It is also stated that since
through cheque to the
2
Complainant/ Informant and had taken two undated cheques for Rs. 7
Lacs and 3 Lacs respectively as security, saying that ... returned to the accused, then he would return both the
undated cheques to the Complainant/Informant.
It has been further alleged that the business term
