Oswal
Metal Industries, Nagaur under Order XXX, Rule 3, C.P.C ., they had
appeared under protest stating that they had retired and as such ... person who had been served as a partner
under Rule 3 appeared under protest, the service on him as such on
the firm
paid by the petitioner
on 21.03.2001 “under protest” pending disposal of the above appeals before
the Hon'ble Supreme Court ... aforesaid amount. Therefore, the petitioner paid the aforesaid amount
“under protest” on 21.03.2001. Eventually, the Hon’ble Supreme Court
allowed the appeal filed
between
duty paid under protest and duty paid under
Rule 9B. The duty paid under protest falls
under Section 11B whereas duty paid under
provisional ... protest. As
stated above, there is a difference under the
Act between payment of duty under protest on
one hand and refund consequent upon
finalization
representation dated 03.11.2008 to explain the circumstances under
which it was forced to deposit the amount under protest. The appellant
also categorically mentioned that ... representation dated 03.11.2008 explaining
the circumstances under which the amount had been deposited under
14
E/53677/2018
protest. The appellant also mentioned that
duty was deposited during investigation and
under the facts and circumstances, it should be treated as payment
under protest. The Commissioner (Appeals) observed that ... 4861/2015 wherein under similar facts
and circumstances the duty was paid (under protest) during
investigation before issue of show cause notice
Petitioner will be participating in the interview,
scheduled on 27.09.2020, under protest and without prejudice to his
rights and remedies in law.
10. Petitioner appeared ... interview on the scheduled date, under
protest, and thereafter, as no response was received to his representation,
he approached this Court
paid by the Petitioner under
protest or adjust it against the dues payable by the Petitioner to the
Opposite Parties.
2. Initially, when the matter ... resulted in a
second amendment to the petition. FACOR paid amounts under
protest and has been issued the MDCC and its trading licence has
also
required to
discharge; however, the petitioner deposited Rs.50,00,000/-
under protest in the month of October, 2004. Thereafter, an
Order-in-Original ... amount of Rs.50,00,000/-
which was deposited by it under protest during the
investigation and subsequently considered to be an adequate
pre-deposit
amounts were paid involuntarily and, therefore,
are deemed to be under protest and should be
considered as deposits needed to be rejected. The
payments have ... deposit, as contemplated under
section 35F of the Act, nor was there anything to
indicate that the payment was made under protest
and hence
amounts were paid involuntarily and, therefore,
are deemed to be under protest and should be
considered as deposits needed to be rejected. The
payments have ... deposit, as contemplated under
section 35F of the Act, nor was there anything to
indicate that the payment was made under protest
and hence
