Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 323 (0.40 seconds)

Bala vs The State on 3 August, 2012

present case, admittedly, the minors are having only the 1/20th unspecified & undivided share in the joint property situated in the Revenue Estate ... deceased Sh.Naresh Kumar is having only the 1/20th unspecified & undivided share in the property in question. It is an admitted fact that
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sushila vs The State on 7 May, 2012

Master Amarjeet Singh. Permission has also been sought to sell the unspecified & undivided 1/16th share of the minor in the agricultural land ... made in the petition, permission was also sought to sell the unspecified & undivided share of minor in the agricultural land in Khata Khatoni
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Bhawna vs The State on 10 April, 2013

case, admittedly, deceased Manoj Kumar is having only the 1/32 unspecified & undivided share in the agricultural land and the permission ... Manoj Kumar, are having only to the extent of 1/32 unspecified & undivided share in the agricultural land in Khata Khatoni
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sakshi Devi vs The State on 31 July, 2013

case, admittedly, deceased Arun Sharma was having only the 1/28th unspecified & undivided share in the property and the permission if can be granted ... Sharma, is having share only to the extent of 1/28th unspecified & undivided GP No. 22/12 8/12 share in the property which
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Gupta vs Nargis Khanna on 10 May, 2018

mesne profits thereof, pleading (i) that the plaintiff purchased 50% undivided unspecified share in the property from Prem Kumar Dewan, brother of the defendant ... plaintiff, therefore the plaintiff has become the sole owner of undivided, unspecified 50% share in the said property; (ii) that the plaintiff is also
Delhi High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - R S Endlaw - Full Document

J Rambabu vs The State Of Ap on 21 June, 2021

Division, Visakhapatnam District on the ground that the subject land is undivided and unspecified area as arbitrary illegal abdication of the statutory cost ... ground that the subject land is "undivided and unspecified area". Respondent No.4 is the competent authority under the provisions of the Andhra
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - M S Murthy - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next