that the property is delivered to the decree holder and no obstruction is caused in executing the decree and further observation that the question ... delivery is also not returned on frivolous grounds, making the decree unexecutable and the Executing Court has been directed to comply with the aforesaid directions
that the property is delivered to the decree holder and no obstruction is caused in executing the decree and further observation that the question ... delivery is also not returned on frivolous grounds, making the decree unexecutable and the Executing Court has been directed to comply with the aforesaid directions
filed because of the simple fact that the Judgment and Decree have become unexecutable because of the policy directives of Securities and Exchange Board ... Petitioner/Appellant has come to know that the decree obtained has become unexecutable etc. and because of the fact that the Petitioner has filed
steps to set aside the Decree passed on 31.12.2002 by the trial Court and that the Decree has been passed by a competent Court ... this case and hence, the decree passed without jurisdiction is nullity and void and unexecutable in the Executing Court" and resultantly allowed the application
order for removal of superstructure, the decree obtained in O.S.No.8417 of 1994 is an unexecutable one and has allowed ... decree for removal of superstructure and unless the decree is amended the execution petition is not maintainable inasmuch as the decree is an unexecutable
known as to whether the respondent/plaintiff has withdrawn 50% of the decree amount from the trial Court in case the same has been deposited ... decree passed in O.S.No.17 of 2003 dated 28.11.2003 by the learned Subordinate Judge, (FTC No.IV) Bhavani is an unexecutable
without impleading them as a party, the Petitioner/Temple has obtained a Decree against the Defendant and stated that they have got eviction order ... given possession cannot be taken and therefore, he returned the warrant unexecuted. Unless the obstructors are removed from the suit property it is the contention
Pon.Saraswathi vs The District Collector on 16 November, 2018
Bench: M. Venugopal , R. Hemalatha
Pon.Saraswathi vs The District Collector on 16 November, 2018
Bench: M. Venugopal , R. Hemalatha
