Haji Abraham Umarji v. State of
Gujara (( 2004 (6) SCC 672), Unique Butyle Tube Industries (P) Ltd. v. U.P.
13
Financial Corpn
advance the remedy intended by the
statute."
( b) Unique Butyle Tube Industries (P) Ltd. Vs U.P.
Financial Corporation and others
Kishorebhai
Khamanchand Goyal Vs. State of Gujarat and Another17 ,
M/s. Unique Butyle Tube Industries ... areas. The Court then analysed the
decision of this Court in Unique Butyle Tube Industries Pvt.
Ltd. (supra) and distinguished the same by holding that
observed in Maulavi Hussein Haji
Abraham Umarji v. State of Gujarat , Unique
Butyle Tube Industries (P) Ltd. v. U.P. Financial
Corpn. and Padma Sundara
drew our attention ig to the judgment in the case of
Unique Butyle Tube Industries (P) Ltd. vs. U.P.
Financial Corporation
Placing strong reliance on A.K. Roy v. State or Punjab, , Unique Butyle Tube Industries (P) Ltd. v. U.P. Financial Corporation , , Asstt. Commr ... Reddy, learned Senior Counsel.
9. In view of the ratio in Unique Butyle Tube Industries (P) Ltd. case ( 11 supra), Velliappa Textiles Ltd. case
statute may become absurd.
The Supreme Court in the case of Unique Butyle Tube
Industries (P) Ltd. v. U.P. Financial Corpn
Placing strong reliance on A.K. Roy v. State of Punjab , , Unique Butyle Tube Industries (P) Ltd. v. U.P. Financial Corporation , , Asstt. Commr ... Reddy, learned Senior Counsel.
9. In view of the ratio in Unique Butyls Tube Industries (P) Ltd case ( supra), Velliappa Textiles Ltd. case (supra
also the
judgments of the Apex Court in M/s. Unique Butyle Tube Industries
Private Limited v. U.P. Financial Corporation and others observed
that
Kalanithi Maran ..Petitioner vs The State Represented By on 9 November, 2018
Author: N. Anand
