purchase of Rs. 2,42,90,382/- from M/s Unique Enterprises.
Various information were called for in this regard. Statement of
managing director ... file a report after visiting the business premises of M/s
Unique Enterprises. Finally, ld. AO came to a conclusion that the
alleged purchases
Bangalore Development Authority vs Unique Enterprises on 20 July, 1984
Equivalent citations: ILR1984KAR1289
JUDGMENT
Narayana Rai Kudoor, J.
1.This Regular First Appeal
Unique Enterprises vs Union Of India on 7 August, 2024
Author: V.G.Arun
Bench: V.G.Arun
2024:KER:63402
IN THE HIGH COURT ... 16TH SRAVANA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 22568 OF 2024
PETITIONER:
UNIQUE ENTERPRISES
REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR MR. HARRIS K K, AGED 36
YEARS
have not been satisfied despite M/s Unique Enterprises
obtaining the power of attorney and unhindered access to the property
by virtue of Clauses ... into a development agreement in 1st January 2000, with M/s. Unique
Enterprises to develop and sell the property. The assessee, in response
Unique Enterprises vs Commissioner Of Central Excise, Mumbai ... on 30 December, 2010
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
WEST ZONAL BENCH ... circulated to the Departmental : Yes
authorities?
======================================================
M/s Unique Enterprises
Roshan Minoo Irani
Appellant
(Represented by:Mr. V.M. Doiphode, Advocate)
Vs
Commissioner of Central
construction business under the name and style of M/s. Unique Enterprises. It was stated that the Opposite Parties had engaged her husband ... said amount was further debited in the account of M/s. Unique Enterprises vide receipt dated 18.06.2013 (Annexure C-3).
4. It was further stated
made on 19.06.2004 to N. Shariff, A/c Unique Enterprises; (ii) An amount of Rs. 18,00,000/- by way of loan withdrawal ... lakhs, according to the petitioners, consists of (a) payment made to Unique Enterprises (Rs. 4 lakhs); (b) payment by the first petitioner (Rs. 3 lakhs
5601/Mum/2009 & ors) order dated 5.8.2011
(vii) Unique Enterprises vs ITO, (ITA No.5109/Mum/2008) order
dated ... Constructions Pvt Ltd. (supra).
42. Further more, in the case of Unique Enterprises (supra), ITAT
Mumbai 'F' Bench in paras
being the employees of M/s.
Cauvery Enterprises and Unique Services, by
tthatching a criminal conspiracy committed acts of
. -. ,. forgery'
cheating. fabrication of documents ... Accused--1 to 4.» that they were all employees--- of
Enterprises and Unique Services;~t~h.at
have discharged their duties entr
case of Bangalore Development Authority v. Unique Enterprises , reported in ILR 1984 (2) KAR 1289, in support of his contentions.
5. The writ petition ... this Court in the case of Bangalore Development Authority v. Unique Enterprises , reported in ILR 1984 (2) Kar 1289, in support of his contention that
