parties (plaintiff and
defendant Ist set) have unity of title and
unity of possession over the suit land, if so,
is plaintiffs ... essential requirement of a partition suit, namely unity of title
and unity of possession, was clearly absent. It is further
submitted that
Shorn of other details, jn short, the plaintiffs claim unity of title and possession with regard to the lands of the aforesaid two khatas ... lands of this khata and bad not asserted unity of title and possession with regard to the lands falling in this khata
upon among the parties ?
(vi) Whether there is unity of title and unity of
possession between the plaintiff and defendants
Patna High Court ... acted upon
amongst them and there is no unity of title and unity of
possession between the plaintiff and defendants with regard
possession of the suit property and therefore, unity of title and unity
of possession over the suit property of the parties does ... possession of the suit property and therefore unity
of title and unity of possession over the suit property of the parties does
possession of the suit property and therefore, unity of title and unity
of possession over the suit property of the parties does ... possession of the suit property and therefore unity
of title and unity of possession over the suit property of the parties does
suit land
and as such there was no unity of title and possession amongst them
and set-aside the judgement of the trial court ... action for the suit?
(iii) Is there any unity of title and possession between the
parties?
(iv) Whether Sk. Md. Gulam Rasul executed
matter relates to partition suit and unity of title,
unity of possession and nucleus of joint family are required to
be seen ... claim of
plaintiffs that there was unity of title and unity of
possession with respect to the properties which could be
subject matter
joint family proportion?
(vii) Have the plaintiffs unity of title and unity of
possession over the land in suit?
(viii) Are the plaintiffs ... favour of the plaintiffs holding that there was unity of
title and unity of possession of both the parties over the suit
land
joint possession and,
therefore, there is unity of title and possession of the parties over the suit
properties.
3. Subsequently, by amendment paragraph ... barred by adverse possession?
v. Whether there is unity of title and possession among the parties?
vi. To what other relief and releifs
that for partition of a suit property, unity of title and possession is the
foremost requirement, came to the conclusion ... that the plaintiff has failed to
prove his unity of title and unity of possession over the suit land, thus, the suit
