page 60 as:-
" Joint tenant have unity of title, unity of
commencement of title, unity of interest ... possession, while in the case of „tenants-in-common‟, though
there is unity of possession, there is no unity of title.
In this
tenancy
by entirety' as there is a unity of possession, title, estate, time
and person. Placing reliance on the judgment of the District ... case of
'joint tenancy' as there is unity of possession, title, estate, and
of time. He submits that such joint tenancy
2011
1. With respect to unity of title and unity of possession, suit for
partition filed by the appellant was held, with consent ... that as long
as the unity of title and unity of possession continues, no co-
owner or co-sharer can stake a claim
distinction has to be drawn in cases where the unity of title and possession
is retained and where different floors are owned in severalty ... concerns title, and unity of possession. Law recognizes that where unity of
ownership is retained, the unity of possession may be disrupted
of title............Tenants in common have unity of possession but not unity of title."
Therefore, if one of the joint tenants ... joint tenants. They had unity of possession but no unity of title. The title of Tarlochan Lal was, therefore, to his own share
firm, all partners thereof have a
unity of title and unity of possession, akin to joint ownership in
a property. Where this relationship ... dissolution thereof, the
division of assets results in unity of title and possession being
severed. Henceforth each one of them holds to the exclusion
there was unity of title, unity of commencement of title, unity
of interest, unity of equal share and possession; (vi) that ... unity of title, unity of
commencement of title, unity of interest, unity of equal share in the
joint estate, unity
firm, all partners thereof have a unity of title and
unity of possession, akin to joint ownership in a property. Where
this relationship ... dissolution thereof, the division of assets results in
unity of title and possession being severed. Henceforth each one of
them holds to the exclusion
present case clearly show that there has always been unity of title and possession amongst the defendants as regards the lease and rental paid
notify that they
are no longer interested in having unity of title and
possession in said estate of Ms.Tej Kaur.
iv) Therefore
