only and he is insisting issuance of the certified copies of unmarked documents
free of cost. The complainant filed
similar complaint before the District Forum ... said
rule and that the complainant pleads that certified copies of unmarked
documents can also be given Rule 188
of C.P.C . reads
repairs dt.23.8.2012. However, a perusal of the said unmarked document, under the caption terms and conditions, it is mentioned as "This ... before the District Commission. But the District Commission, by taking the unmarked document into consideration, had come to the conclusion that the earlier estimation given
Cheque No.400704
Ex.B4 Cheque No.400703
Unmarked
documents
1.
Cheque No.400702
2.
Letter
3.
Letter
MEMBER
MEMBER
EVIDENCE
WITNESSES EXAMINED
For complainant for
opposite parties
NIL NIL
UNMARKED
DOCUMENTS
For complainant
1.
Inventory sheet dated 11.02.2012,
2.
Registration certificate,
3.
Early termination
totally
devoid of substance and truth.
8. The some of unmarked documents available with the records of District
Forum where called for by this commission
aside.
The Commission below failed to go through the documents
filed by the opposite party and also wrong in concluding;
that the opposite party adopted ... name of his grand-children not
marked them. The unmarked documents cannot be looked into.
The Complaint was filed in the year 2017, mentioning
document. This document cannot be treated as a piece of evidence as per the evidence Act. On other hand, the Ext.P3 document ... important document. On other side, the Forum below considered these unmarked documents and other side of totally discarded. What was the norm adopted
steps was taken to file
any separate application for receiving additional documents in the appeal. Originally
the consumer complaint was filed in the year ... Therefore, the Commission is
decided to consider those documents for taking judicial notice which are unmarked
and available with records.
10. No additional evidences were
were marked on the side of the complainants. Two documents subsequently produced were marked as Exts.A11 and A12.
4. The opposite party neither ... relates to apartment No. D 134 only. But Ext.A11 document is produced subsequently to show that the complainants have entered into an agreement
said NPA account on 01/01/2015, the same was
unmarked on 02/01/2015 to pay a cheque of Rs. 29,646/- drawn ... Hence the
complaint is liable to be dismissed.
5. The OP produced documents showing the proceedings filed
under Section 14 of the Sarfaesi Act filed
