fair investigation and direct the
said Court, to furnish the remaining unmarked documents in C.C. No.25 of
2021 for aiding the investigation under ... fair investigation and direct the
said Judge, to furnish the remaining unmarked documents in C.C. No.24 of
2021 for aiding the investigation under
some documents have been
marked and exhibited by the prosecution while some other documents have
not been so utilised. As all such documents had been ... 2012) had set out a complete list of the unmarked documents
mentioning the particulars of the search lists by which the documents
were seized
after
around the 2 days.
airport.
7
It is an unexhibited/unmarked document at pages ... unexhibited/unmarked document; copy thereof at page 225 of D-27.
11
It is an unexhibited/unmarked document at page
However, the Trial Court refused to issue
11
certified copies of unmarked documents.
(xxi) As against the order dated 30.07.2021 passed by the
Madras High ... order of the Trial Court
refusing to grant certified copies of unmarked documents, the ED filed
petitions before the High Court. By an order dated
production of First
Information Reports etc. The request for furnishing unmarked documents
were refused by the trial Court, as against which the respondent came ... trial Court
declined to grant the certified copies of the unmarked documents. Therefore,
the respondent Department approached the High Court with Criminal
view that there is no necessity for the Court to keep unmarked documents in the records or become a custodian of such unmarked documents unwillingly ... documents, which have been tendered in evidence, have been rejected, have to be returned to the party who produced such documents. If those documents
petitioner, went at a tangent and looked in to the unmarked documents in serial no.13 to 19 and on that basis, gave a finding ... would have helped the petitioner. Secondly, it looked into the unmarked documents without any justification and found that the petitioner was only a contract labour
which is
unmarked yet again.
45(a). But the lower Appellate Court has committed another
mistake in relying upon the unmarked document without calling ... same in the cross-examination reliance
cannot be placed upon the unmarked document in the civil proceedings. As
stated supra subsequent to the suit sale
unmarked documents including the agreement of sale dated 17.10.2006. The trial Court ordered return of documents 2 to 5 and in respect of document ... Court became functus officio, therefore, it ought to have returned the unmarked document without resorting to collect the stamp duty and penalty on agreement
hand written letter dated 04.03.2010 is not his signature. Unmarked document cannot be sent for comparison of the signature. Only contemporaneous document can be sent ... affidavit and counter affidavit, dismissed the application holding that unmarked document cannot be sent for comparison and petitioner has not produced any contemporaneous document
