seen that it reached only on
20.02.2004. But surely, an unmarked document cannot be relied upon
by this Court. Thus, in this case, there ... delay in reaching the
article, even if the unmarked document, is taken into consideration.
Surely, an unmarked document, cannot be looked into by this court
accused attempts to
build up an argument with the help of an unmarked case
sheet which was got produced from the Medical College
Hospital, Kottayam ... Superintendent of the Jail as also the entries in that unmarked
document. They suggest, assuming that we can look into to it
and consider
Though this court has called for the entire records
including the unmarked documents, the court below send
a reply stating that all the available documents
that the property list
was not marked in the proceeding. An unmarked document cannot be
considered at the appellate stage. Moreover, the said aspect
seen that the forwarding note was not marked. An unmarked
document cannot be looked into. Thus, considering the
Crl.Appl
only an omission. It is also pointed out that the unmarked
document will reveal that the property list reached before
the court immediately ... forwarding note also can be
seen in the file.
5. Unmarked documents cannot be looked into by
this court at the appellate stage. Surely
that the forwarding note was not marked in the proceeding. An
unmarked document cannot be looked into, to come to a
conclusion that accused committed
assumed
that, the said forwarding note was not marked. An
unmarked document cannot be looked into. When the
property list is not before the court
opposed to the
endorsement contained in Ext.P1 mahazar. So the
documents of the prosecution, thus create serious doubt
with respect to the genuineness ... chemical examiner for
analysis. Even assuming that the said
unmarked document could be relied on,
there is nothing to show that the sample
bottle
produced any document to show that the
appointment was for a period of one year and without the
basic document being produced, the courts below ... courts below have wrongly relied on the contents of the
unmarked document for the purpose of arriving such a
conclusion. He had also contended that
