document has gone to the extend of saying that in that unmarked document, the translator has stated that he knows Telugu and Tamil, therefore ... confers title to the plaintiff. Relying upon the content of an unmarked document, without examining the author of the said unmarked document is unknown
directed the Trial Court to send all the immaterial records and unmarked documents to the First Appellate Court on or before 22.09.2010.
3. The petitioners ... Court directed the Trial Court to send for immaterial records and unmarked documents. The First Appellate Court can come to a different conclusion. The First
certified copy of the Will remains on record as an unmarked document.
Therefore, as per the records, the alleged loss of Will, the signature
lists put in by parties, of documents produced by them should be entered in the index, but the documents themselves should only be so entered ... Circular order it is very clear that unmarked documents would not form part of the record and it should be kept in a separate bundle
lists put in by parties, of documents produced by them should be entered in the index, but the documents themselves should only be so entered ... Circular order it is very clear that unmarked documents would not form part of the record and it should be kept in a separate bundle
arisen
before us is a situation where evidently the unmarked
and unexhibited documents of the case that are being
demanded by the accused had been ... cast some cloud on the issue as to whether the
unmarked and unexhibited documents are a part of the
report under Section
marked in the suit
and seeking production of an unmarked document itself is not in accordance
with the Code of Civil Procedure
produced any document to show that the
appointment was for a period of one year and without the
basic document being produced, the courts below ... courts below have wrongly relied on the contents of the
unmarked document for the purpose of arriving such a
conclusion. He had also contended that
mark any document. The Court cannot consider the unmarked document. The 5th respondent filed a memo stating that the petitioner has not informed about
produced by P.W.3 Suresh Dr.Mallappa Dugannai
and also unmarked document of Dr.Makanadar which is
looked into, this Court feel that
