hand written letter dated 04.03.2010 is not his signature. Unmarked document cannot be sent for comparison of the signature. Only contemporaneous document can be sent ... affidavit and counter affidavit, dismissed the application holding that unmarked document cannot be sent for comparison and petitioner has not produced any contemporaneous document
statement
Ex.P1 and also not explaining the circumstances why
the document was discarded. Further there is gap of 12
hours for registering ... fact of non considering Ex.P1. In the further
circumstance, unmarked document said to be the
statement of Jabeena does not contain the features
respondent, especially
when it is coparcener property?
(ii) Whether a document executed lis pendens be
given effect to when the rights of the parties ... Whether the Courts below are right in relying
upon an unmarked document in the suit
premium is received from him, as
could be seen from the unmarked document produced by the
petitioner, on 7.6.2018 where the receipt issued for receiving
discussed the same which is not at all
correct and an unmarked document even received as additional
evidence placing reliance in its discretion ... remanding the matter for the perversity in
relying upon an unmarked document and discussing it in the
judgment by the lower appellate Court, including based
present Court, he filed a
petition for return of the unmarked documents having undertaken to
file before this Court. Earlier the Court made an observations ... accused admitted in his application under Section 219 CrPC of listed
documents unmarked, he cannot take any advantage out of the Court
that there
judis.nic.in
14
Judge, Chengalpattu to send the unmarked documents detailed therein
namely
a) The original conditions issued by the
Executive Officer, Nandivara -Guduvancherry
when the document itself has been
rejected for being marked, the first appellate Court ought not have relied upon
the same document without the same ... Further, the first appellate
Court culled out certain facts from the unmarked documents and recorded a
definite finding to reverse the finding of the trial
ground that the
court below has made a detailed discussion on unmarked
document i.e. 'Jeevana Khararu Bidagade Pathra ... settled judicial principles, unmarked documents cannot be
commented upon and basing on that, no orders can be passed.
On the ground, the order passed
during the examination of the plaintiff, she was
confronted with the said documents and the plaintiff / respondent herein
denied, having executed the same. Such ... learned counsel for
the respondent that the question of sending an unmarked document for expert
opinion will not arise. It is admitted that the document
