been stated that she had rendered her service
only in an unsanctioned post and the respondents had refused to grant
approval or recognition ... post. Her post was finally recognized as BT Assistant only on 02.10.2016.
Thereafter, she had been promoted on vacancy which arose to the post
said post has ceased from existence on 29.02.1984 there is no
sanctioned post. Hence, the petitioner was appointed in temporary basis
in unsanctioned post ... vide
proceedings dated 07.01.1985. Since the petitioner is appointed in an
unsanctioned post the petitioner is not entitled to be considered for
regularization. Moreover
been serving with effect from 24/07/2001
against an unsanctioned post.
In this circumstances the petitioner's claim for appointment in
the post ... been serving w.e.f. July 24, 2001 against an
unsanctioned post. She submitted that it was, thus, incorrect to allege that the
alleged contemnor
onwards, then the school or the person appointed in the said post
cannot claim grant-in-aid for the earlier period. The school appointment ... Hence, the said person was working as management employee in an
unsanctioned post and hence the school is not entitled to any financial assistant
from
period of
service rendered in the recognized school under the unsanctioned post prior to
01.06.1991 cannot be taken into consideration for fixation ... unapproved, self-financed management post.
The service rendered in an unsanctioned post, unapproved post, self-financed
management post, Matriculation service will be considered as private
whether the appointment of the
petitioner to the post of Typist is as against the sanctioned post
or not. In this regard, on careful consideration ... that, the appellant in
the said case was working against the unsanctioned post and
thereafter, by order dated 03.01.2002, appointed the appellant
against the sanctioned
domain of the
legislature. However in the instant case creation of new posts
would not create any additional financial burden to the State ... regularised
w.e.f. 1987. The appellant although initially working against
unsanctioned post, the appellant was working continuously since
3-1-2002 against sanctioned post
domain of the legislature. However in the instant case
creation of new posts would not create any additional
financial burden to the State ... regularised w.e.f. 1987. The
appellant although initially working against unsanctioned
post, the appellant was working continuously since 3-1-2002
against sanctioned post
appellant and
Shri Vijay Pratap Singh had been
appointed against unsanctioned post,
which render their appointment illegal.
7. That it is humbly stated that
after ... appointment of Shri Vijay Pratap Singh
has been done on unsanctioned post,
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1076
domain of the legislature. However
in the instant case creation of new posts would not create
any additional financial burden to the State ... regularised w.e.f. 1987. The appellant although initially
working against unsanctioned post, the appellant was
working continuously since 3-1-2002 against sanctioned
post
