apply 2017
Policy.
4. As regards the expression about the "unsatisfactory performance", which is
mentioned in the above said Clause, is concerned ... submit that though initially the respondents had mentioned about the
"unsatisfactory performance" of the petitioner during the first period of
contract, but subsequently
remain in service, they are entitled to record a finding of
unsatisfactory performance of the work and duties during the period
of probation. Under these ... finding that
during that probation period, the work and performance of the duties
were unsatisfactory, they are entitled to terminate the service in
terms
foul play, as the case may be, and accordingly his performance being unsatisfactory, they are cancelling the power of attorney deed executed in his favour ... contained in Ex.A5 that the first defendant's performance was unsatisfactory or he acted in a fraudulent manner or indulged
remain in service they are
entitled to record a finding of unsatisfactory performance of
the work and duties during the period of probation. Under
these ... finding
that during that probation period, the work and
performance of the duties were unsatisfactory, they are
http://www.judis.nic.in
18
entitled
period of two years from 01.09.1991 and in the event of unsatisfactory
performance, the services are liable to be terminated without any notice
during ... that he has un-authorisedly absented himself
and his services were also unsatisfactory, thought it fit to terminate him
from service. The Tribunal also found
three line impugned order of termination dated 11.12.2017 stating that the performance of the petitioner was not satisfactory. The said approach adopted by the respondent ... agreement, in case of improper conduct and/or unsatisfactory performance by the Signatory, having regard in particular to the terms and reference mentioned above, DCPS
days notice to the contractor, in case the performance of the contractor is found to be unsatisfactory and it shall be lawful for the Corporation
S.Murugadoss vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 10 September, 2018
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE
Srinidhi Karti Chidambaram vs The Principal Chief Commissioner Of on 2 November, 2018
Bench: S
Elephant G.Rajendran vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 1 August, 2018
Author: R
