unsatisfactory performance were brought to your notice. You were advised to improve your performance considerably.
Since during the extended period also your performance ... examined your conduct, performance, ability and capacity during the whole period of probation but your performance is found to be unsatisfactory and you are considered
completed upon rendition of satisfactory service. Only in the event of
unsatisfactory performance by the employee, the termination of probation
would have been held ... that when
the foundation for such an order is not the unsatisfactory performance on the
part of the employee but overt acts amounting to misconduct
services during the probationary period on the ground of his unsatisfactory performance and, thus, the learned Trial Judge committed a serious error in allowing ... whether the performance of the respondent was satisfactory or not. Unsatisfactory performance may lead to the termination of the services on or before the probationary
failure in examinations by the recruits/cadets amount to unsatisfactory conduct an unsatisfactory performance respectively under Rule 17(a)(ii) of A.P. State Subordinate ... into consideration inasmuch as the said order has never been challenged. Unsatisfactory performance of the respondent is one of the principal grounds which resulted
curtailed except on such just grounds as, for example,
unsuitability or unsatisfactory performance. But, even where the tenure is
not specified, an order of reversion
legal requirements for discharging a probationer
on the ground of his unsatisfactory performance has recently been
considered by us in Municipal Committee, Sirsa vs. Munshi ... given to the respondent herein.
Since the overall performance of the respondent was
found to be unsatisfactory by the High Court during the
period
presumably has
been reached by experts.
The reasons as regards purported unsatisfactory performance of
Appellants, take a back seat once having a re-look
provision.
16. If the satisfaction of the employer rested on the unsatisfactory
performance on the part of the appellant, the matter might have been
different ... have to. The
governing body is of the view that your
performance was unsatisfactory and you are not
suitable for confirmation.
20. Yet again
widely acknowledged truth. However, to draw an inference that their unsatisfactory performance points to their being founded on a fundamentally unsound principle would
right to be appointed permanently by the employer would depend upon his performance during the period of Probation. It is also a well settled principle ... Management was his unsuitability for the job based on his unsatisfactory performance during the probation period which was obvious from the office note on which
