Supreme Court Of India vs Milap Chand Jagotra on 27 March, 2026
IN THE COURT
standing
by the side of Complainant.
38. Now, coming to documents Ex. CW1/8, Ex. CW1/9 and
Ex. CW1/10 which ... admittedly Ex. CW1/8 and Ex. CW1/9 are
unsigned documents and DW1 has denied her handwriting on
them. Thus, these two documents
document purported to be in the name of Yogesh Mittal
is unsigned document. No signature on it. As regard the
allegation of snatching of Innova
Colly), CW - 1 now admits that the
same is an unsigned document. He also claims to be unaware as to
who received the cheques
PW12
deposed that since the said invoice was a single document, so the fare of
both the passengers was mentioned collectively against the name ... against second passenger Zero Fare was mentioned as
only one airline document is issued for both passengers. PW12 also
added that the fare
petitioners have not even proved their site plan, which is
an unsigned document.
22.2 He further submitted that the SPA holder for petitioners
had been
State vs Deepak on 8 May, 2024
DLSW010043402015
IN THE COURT OF MS. GURMOHINA KAUR
High Court, Lucknow Bench, U.P dated 02.11.2021
Annexure1 and one unsigned ordersheet of Ld. M.M Aditi Rao M.M NI
Act South ... such
further annexure2 filed by the accused is again an unsigned document and
can not be taken into account. The accused in the present
Sudhir Kumar vs Anand Kumar on 8 May, 2024
DLSW010043402015
IN THE COURT OF MS
reliance is misplaced. He
mentioned that the said document is unsigned and there is nothing on
record to show its origin. He mentioned that this ... when it was filed by the defendants along with record.
The document is unsigned and it is not possible to ascertain the
authority