Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 76 (3.88 seconds)

State vs 1. Gopal Goyal Kanda on 10 May, 2013

does not apply. 20. It is further argued that the affidavits were unsigned so these were only draft affidavits which were to be signed ... does not make these forged documents. The possession of the same does not attract Section 474 IPC. These unsigned affidavits cannot be used
Delhi District Court Cites 86 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs 1. Gopal Goyal Kanda on 10 May, 2013

does not apply. 20. It is further argued that the affidavits were unsigned so these were only draft affidavits which were to be signed ... does not make these forged documents. The possession of the same does not attract Section 474 IPC. These unsigned affidavits cannot be used
Delhi District Court Cites 86 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Cbi vs 1. Amal Kumar Roy on 1 October, 2013

that there was no notification or any document showing that only Director of Health Services was empowered to issue nomination letters to the candidates ... relating to different categories are incomplete, unsigned and fabricated documents. Accused no.2, Ms. Rupa Ghosh has also denied the allegations that co­accused
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Ravi Kumar on 4 October, 2013

submitted that on account of heavy work load the MLC may remain unsigned with only names of the doctors written on them). He further stated ... unsigned with only name of the doctors written on them. He further denied the suggestion that Ex. PW-6/A was a manipulated document
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next