Starlit E- Recylers Pvt. Ltd vs . Npp Energy Ltd & Ors on 16 August, 2022
case, the complainant has relied
upon a mere extract and an unsigned document i.e., Ex- CW-1/H which is in its
present form
Search Results Page
Search Results
21 - 30 of 1298 (0.41 seconds)Starlit E- Recylers Pvt. Ltd vs . Npp Energy Ltd & Ors on 16 August, 2022
case, the complainant has relied
upon a mere extract and an unsigned document i.e., Ex- CW-1/H which is in its
present form
Starlit E- Recylers Pvt. Ltd vs . Npp Energy Ltd & Ors on 16 August, 2022
case, the complainant has relied
upon a mere extract and an unsigned document i.e., Ex- CW-1/L which is in its
present form
Cc No. 9832/2016 M/S East West Fire Engg. vs . M/S Vasu Infosec 1 Of 18 on 25 August, 2021
complainant has only
relied upon a mere extract and an unsigned document i.e., Ex- CW-1/4 which
is in its present form
Naresh Kumar S/O. Sh. Tara Chand vs M/S. Kirti Graphic on 22 August, 2014
order dated
02.09.2013 an application moved by workman seeking production of certain documents
from management was dismissed. WE was closed on 13.11.2013 by ld. counsel ... being unsigned
documents. Management in the course of crossexamination of workman also relied
upon Ex. WW1/M1X Biodata of workman
Sunil Kumar vs M/S Travel Oyster India Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2025
Further, the Ex. ME-1/1 (Colly 6 pages) is an
unsigned document and hence it cannot be relied upon.
26. Management has not placed
Leela Devi vs . Deepak Madan on 8 June, 2023
demand notice, Ex.CW-1/C placed on record is an unsigned
document and hence, cannot be relied upon by this court. Ld.
counsel ... submitted that without signature the
document is incomplete and in the eyes of law may not be a
document having legal force. In this regard
Adnan Hasan Kidwai vs M/S Choce Development Co. ( P ) Ltd And Ors on 24 March, 2026
Adnan Hasan Kidwai vs M/S Choce Development Co. ( P ) Ltd And Ors on 24
Kanchan Kumar vs Jasbir Singh on 29 April, 2026
petitioners have not even proved their site plan, which is
an unsigned document.
22.2 He further submitted that the SPA holder for petitioners
had been
Kanchan Kumar vs Ram Lal on 29 April, 2026
petitioners have not even proved their site plan, which is
an unsigned document.
22.2 He further submitted that the SPA holder for petitioners
had been