under:-
"This related file has been in search at Office Document record section. Once the
file is got information will be provided."
Dissatisfied ... could not fulfil his purpose. The Appellant alleged that
incomplete and unsigned documents have been received from the Respondent public authority on
07.12.2021. The Appellant
been closed on
15th July 2016 attaching an electronically forged unsigned fraudulent document,
hiding the identity of the deciding authority and stating,
"The subject ... Doordarshan from
11.07.2016 to 15.07.2016 stating to implement an electronically forged
unsigned fraudulent order mentioned in bold letters above.
2) The attested copy
irrespective of
proving such documents. According to him, the documents, which are
placed on record are photocopies of certified documents by the Public
Information Officer ... would invite attention of this Court to the
document i.e. unsigned agreement executed sometime in January,
1976, which is produced as Exhibit
along with other related documents. The Commission further observes that
although the relevant documents as sought in the instant RTI Application has
already been provided ... appellant has raised an issue
on providing unsigned/unattested copy of relevant documents.
8. In view of the above, the Commission deems
that as far as the issue for not providing
unsigned/unattested copy of the relevant documents are concerned, the signed
copy of the relevant documents ... appellant has raised an issue of providing him the
unattested/unsigned copy of the documents with respect to the rest of the
queries as sought
subunit the required documents up to 15.01.2019, In the
letter it was clearly mentioned that if the required documents do not teach
KVS upto ... documents. Thereafter no
representation/application/request will be entertained by KVS regarding
their candidature. In response of KVS letter dated 01.01.2019, the required
documents
Profusely
For information purpose only
relying on Exts.P4 and P5 documents, the 2nd respondent allowed the
appeal by Ext.P3 order ... would reveal that the property
covered under the said documents are unsurveyed lands. However,
Exts.P1 and P2 read along with
Limited, Bangalore,
seeking following information:
(i) One copy each of all the documents submitted by him to respondent's office in
respect ... signed
with copy thereof.
(v) Whether respondent had issued any unsigned letter to him on February 01, 2019
and if so a copy thereof
qualifying in the PET, he was called
for documents verification and medical examination on
21.01.2013. Both documents verification as well as
medical examination was done ... made an
application dated 17.06.2013 and sought information
and documents with regard to his rejection.
Respondent No. 3 vide letter dated 24.07.2013 i.e.
Annexure
contentions. The Appellant has further
mentioned that vide envelope dated 13.02.2019, an unsigned and undated
response was sent by the Respondent, copy whereof has been ... information, without any
justification. He further stated that subsequently, an undated and unsigned
reply was sent by the Respondent vide an envelope dated 13.02.2019, which
