documents and if opportunity is given to the defendants to file those documents before the lower Court, he would get those documents verified ... documents would reveal that those are all unauthentic documents and admittedly they do not bear any signature and they are not public documents also. Order
well settled that sending a telegram by itself is not an authenticated document and it has to be confirmed by a subsequent signed application, representation ... telegrams. A telegram by itself is not an authentic document. It is like an unsigned/anonymous communication. Unless a telegram is confirmed by a subsequent
affidavit are
substantiated. Another document which is found in the typed set of papers is
an unsigned, undated, hand written note wherein certain allegations have ... apprehensions to the fourth respondent on
15.09.2008 with relevant documents, the fourth respondent has not conducted any
investigation on the doubts raised by the petitioner
Ennore Port that as per clause 3.2.3 of the RFQ document for the purpose a project to be considered to be an eligible project ... incomplete and unsigned as required under the formats in Sl.Nos.13 / 14 of Appendix-I, Annexure-IV of the RFQ document. Even when
documents were relied upon by the trial Court. These two documents should have been rejected even from the point of evidence. That apart, these documents ... stated to be a letter which remained undated and also unsigned, and therefore, it cannot be put in evidence
Ennore Port Trust vs M/S.Hcc Van Oord Acz Joint Venture on 14 August
G.Murugan vs The Secretary To Government on 11 September, 2009
Author: T.S.Sivagnanam
S.Antony Jeyabalan vs The Inspector Of Police on 17 September, 2009
Author: T.S
Chinnathambi vs State Through on 28 August, 2009
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS
R.Sathiyan vs The Senior Area Manager on 12 August, 2009
Author: T.S.Sivagnanam
