whether a document i.e. Exh. 49 can be identified as a contractual document. Admittedly it is an unsigned document either by the consignor ... either a contractual document or an integral part of the contractual document. Then it is an unsigned document, Therefore, it will now be examined whether
dated
22.01.2008 and supplementary MOU dated 18.03.2008 were
remained unsigned and the said unsigned documents were of no
evidentiary value in the eyes ... again reiterated that this document was never executed
between us and M/s. Horizon Buildcon (P) Ltd, hence was unsigned and
unexecuted.
The details
document/information?
Ans. I have only been shown one document today saying
that it is from HSBC Geneva. This document does not
have any signature ... similar kind of
paper/document in which his name, address and other
particulars were appearing. The documents were unsigned
as the document which was shown
that such unsigned draft
agreement has no evidentiary value and actual transaction cannot be
presumed merely on the basis of such unsigned document without
appreciating ... such draft unsigned agreement has no evidentiary value and the transaction
(payment) cannot be presumed merely on the basis of such unsigned
document. He also
examined by the departmental
authorities. According to the Tribunal, the unsigned document which
was stated to have never been acted upon by the parties cannot ... document was unsigned, that Mohini Sharma was not
examined by the income tax authorities and there was no corroboration
of the unsigned document
paper book. He has pleaded that the seized documents are unsigned and the documents have been seized from the co-respondent and no reliance should ... binding on the Delhi Tribunal. He has pleaded that the seized documents are unsigned and there are no comments by the senior officers. These documents
draft documents. The
applicant submits that the documents had not been filed before any
statutory authorities and the same were only draft documents prepared
from ... investigation report, the documents were seized from the
possession of Jitender Kumar Sharma (Accused No. 79) and all these
documents were unsigned and unfiled
that his bag was stolen from his car wherein signed and unsigned documents were placed. It appears that the aforesaid cheque came in the hands ... alleging therein about an incident where his bag containing signed and unsigned documents along with other cheques, was lost. It appears that the aforesaid cheque
Navneet Jhamb, New Delhi vs Acit, Faridabad on 25 June, 2018
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
report dated 30.10.2007 by UBS AG, the same is an
unsigned document. The same is not admitted. The gist of the same though
gets included ... from UBS AG to
ED No.1. The said letters are unsigned documents and, accordingly, have
little evidentiary value.
e) Letter by UBS AG dated
