respondent No.2
that the said application was returned, as the documents
pertaining to her father, grandfather and great grandfather
were from Washim District. Therefore ... perusal of the said document, it reveals that
it is unsigned document, nor there is any outward number.
There is no date on which
Since
applicant never worked with respondent,
documents demanded not available with
respondent. That further as per manual
documents is 5 yrs. old are destroyed ... order passed on that application directing present
petitioners to produce the documents. Thus, unsigned,
undated order typed on the application is doubtful. As
such, what
Since
applicant never worked with respondent,
documents demanded not available with
respondent. That further as per manual
documents is 5 yrs. old are destroyed ... order passed on that application directing present
petitioners to produce the documents. Thus, unsigned,
undated order typed on the application is doubtful. As
such, what
Since
applicant never worked with respondent,
documents demanded not available with
respondent. That further as per manual
documents is 5 yrs. old are destroyed ... order passed on that application directing present
petitioners to produce the documents. Thus, unsigned,
undated order typed on the application is doubtful. As
such, what
Since
applicant never worked with respondent,
documents demanded not available with
respondent. That further as per manual
documents is 5 yrs. old are destroyed ... order passed on that application directing present
petitioners to produce the documents. Thus, unsigned,
undated order typed on the application is doubtful. As
such, what
Since
applicant never worked with respondent,
documents demanded not available with
respondent. That further as per manual
documents is 5 yrs. old are destroyed ... order passed on that application directing present
petitioners to produce the documents. Thus, unsigned,
undated order typed on the application is doubtful. As
such, what
Since
applicant never worked with respondent,
documents demanded not available with
respondent. That further as per manual
documents is 5 yrs. old are destroyed ... order passed on that application directing present
petitioners to produce the documents. Thus, unsigned,
undated order typed on the application is doubtful. As
such, what
Since
applicant never worked with respondent,
documents demanded not available with
respondent. That further as per manual
documents is 5 yrs. old are destroyed ... order passed on that application directing present
petitioners to produce the documents. Thus, unsigned,
undated order typed on the application is doubtful. As
such, what
Since
applicant never worked with respondent,
documents demanded not available with
respondent. That further as per manual
documents is 5 yrs. old are destroyed ... order passed on that application directing present
petitioners to produce the documents. Thus, unsigned,
undated order typed on the application is doubtful. As
such, what
Since
applicant never worked with respondent,
documents demanded not available with
respondent. That further as per manual
documents is 5 yrs. old are destroyed ... order passed on that application directing present
petitioners to produce the documents. Thus, unsigned,
undated order typed on the application is doubtful. As
such, what
