reads as under :-
"10. Since learned Tribunal placed reliance on the
statements of witnesses recorded u/S. 161 CrPC. I deem it
appropriate ... writing. Thus every valid and lawful case diary is
unsigned by the witness. The statement recorded u/S. 161
CrPC cannot be used
fabricated documents :
(a) Defendant has produced Bunkering Statement dated
3rd October 2016, Unsigned charter party dated 11th July 2016, email
communications, payment receipt
condition not named in the offer". The endorsement is a statement
made in generalities about an event schedule yet to be decided. This ... have caused ROML to simply return the document
unsigned. The endorsement also cannot be a statement that the
Sponsorship Agreement is not to be effective
days 2 hours attracting
demurrage charges. Statement of facts was issued on
23.06.2021 to 1st respondent, though unsigned by shipper, along
with invoice for demurrages ... initiating any legal steps. Even
respondents merely denied the statement of facts to be unsigned
by one of the parties, and first invoice was never
contents of the statement
(Ext.26) stated to have been made by Mana Pal while undergoing
treatment. This is however unsigned by any doctor
cognizance taken
of complaint on 16.03.2016 on unsigned affidavit purportedly filed
as a preliminary statement bad in law and quashed with further
order that permission ... holding the cognizance taken of complaint on
16.03.2016 on unsigned affidavit purportedlyfiled as a preliminary
statement bad in law and quashed with further order that
page
426. It is an unsigned and unverified statement. Pathak himself gave
evidence and has filed an Affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief
from
page
426. It is an unsigned and unverified statement. Pathak himself gave
evidence and has filed an Affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief
from
been filled up by the assessee. Computation of income and statement of affairs are unsigned. Page 2 of the paper book which is the capital ... return was pressed while computing under S. 143 of the Act. The statement of affair cannot be said disclosing fully and truly all the material
best, rests on inadmissible Section 50 of the PMLA statements of co-
accused persons and unsigned diaries, both of which lack any
substantive evidentiary value
