complaint. Learned counsel also submitted that in the 161 Cr.P.C . statement of Ilavarasi, she has categorically stated that she has not given ... cannot be countenanced. The 161 Cr.P.C . statement is an unsigned statement written by the police at the earliest point of time
tell by
checking them from his statement of accounts.
At this stage, witness has been confronted with the statement of
accounts, to which ... issuing the cheque in question as blank unsigned
cheque to the complainant for security purpose, in his statement under section 313
Cr.P.C. Accused
tell by
checking them from his statement of accounts.
At this stage, witness has been confronted with the statement of
accounts, to which ... issuing the cheque in question as blank unsigned
cheque to the complainant for security purpose, in his statement under section 313
Cr.P.C. Accused
unsigned and is a photocopy and therefore
the contents of same cannot be looked upon, specifically when, HC
Jai Bhagwan in his statement ... unsigned and is a photocopy and therefore, the contents of the same
cannot be looked upon specifically when HC Jai Bhagwan in his
statement
Saran, Bihar. As per
ordinary trade practice, I gave one blank unsigned cheque to the
Complainant for security purpose. I did not receive legal notice ... notice, statement u/s. 313 CrPC as well as defence
evidence. He has stated that he had given the cheque as an unsigned blank cheque
amount. The bank
17 C.C.No.26941/2014
statement Ex.P.8 clearly goes to show about the transfer of money
made from ... true that the Ex.P.17 M.O.U. is unsigned by the
parties. So that document is not admissible in evidence.
However, the other
taken a loan from the complainant and upon being
confronted by his statements recorded u/s 313 of Cr.PC, he clarified
that ... complaint). Upon
being confronted by his statement u/s 313 Cr.PC regarding his
PARAMJEET VS. RAJESH PHALSWAL Page 6 of 20
CC No. 24517
accused. It would also be pertinent to
peruse the following statements made by the complainant
during his cross examination on 06.09.2012: 'My firm
maintains ... averred: "it is correct that Ex. CW 1/B
(colly) are unsigned. (Vol. However each of these bills
contain the receipt
Chinnathambi vs State Through on 28 August, 2009
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS
M.Puttappa vs L.Venkatesh on 23 April, 2021
IN THE COURT OF THE XXIII
