that the Director of Vigilance and
Anti-Corruption had obtained signed statements which were
confessional and self-incriminatory from persons who were
going ... giving
them assurances of immunity and thereafter relying on their
subsequent unsigned statements those under S. 161(3) of the
Code for the purpose
statement before the investigating officer of
the CBI. The court observed that the Investigating Officer of the CBI, after
recording the petitioner's statement ... November, 2013 and
gave a signed letter and unsigned statement stating that this was in
compliance of the order dated 16th September, 2013. Copies
submitted that the signed statements for which assurances had been given to the witnesses are statements taken after investigation commenced ... fraud on the procedure to rely on subsequent unsigned statements as statements under S. 161(3) Cr.P.C. for the purpose
Authority has not been empowered to review its own decision.
(d) The statement of Shri Neeraj Singh, minor son of Shri D. M.
Singh recorded ... does not bear the signature of Shri
Neeraj Singh. Legally an unsigned statement recorded by the
5
Police cannot be considered as a piece
during 2006 with bank officials and cheated the complainant by submitting glossy, unsigned, fudged and inflated balance sheet to avail over draft facilities ... inflated and fudged, unsigned documents produced before the bank for the purpose of obtaining loans. As per, 161 Cr.PC statement, the petitioner
unsigned and is a photocopy and therefore
the contents of same cannot be looked upon, specifically when, HC
Jai Bhagwan in his statement ... unsigned and is a photocopy and therefore, the contents of the same
cannot be looked upon specifically when HC Jai Bhagwan in his
statement
outstanding dues to the bank."
xxx
As per evidences / statements deposed by prosecution witnesses during
cross examined by the learned counsel of defence ... sanction loan proposal of M/s. Neelam spices on the basis of unsigned
documents of borrowers / guarantors and documents not verified with
original
2.2002 To 31.07.2002 vs . on 28 March, 2023
IN THE COURT OF MOHD. FARRUKH,
SPECIAL
liability statement of Major Jagdish Lal Segan and fake and
forged balance sheet and financial statement of the firm, false assets and liability
statement ... accepted these documents from A1
and also accepted unsigned CMA data from the borrower and also did not call for
any formal application/request
Digvijay Nath Tewari vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 12 February, 2020
