under Section 161 Cr.P.C., which is an unsigned statement, cannot have any
authenticity or evidentiary value. Because the said witness has not given
D.V.Gautam vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors. on 23 August, 2013
statement made on
behalf of the petitioner-company in the affidavit dated 17th July,
1998 that the respondent-company had furnished the statement of
accounts ... July,
1998. The mere statement in the said affidavit that the unsigned
statement of accounts was subject to the finalisation of the disputes
cannot
considering the present controversy, statement of Ankita, sister of Pawan Kumar might not be directly related, however, the statement given by Pawan Kumar has been ... required to be exercised judiciously and objectively. There might be an unsigned statement on the record and there might be other material which is more
testimony before Tribunal has to be given necessary
weightage over unsworn unsigned statement recorded by the Policy and as breach
of policy not being proved
vide letter dated
30.01.1981, to record his statement but he was told that his statement
was not required. Even the investigating Officer of CBI (defendant ... manufactured,
had false evidence against the plaintiff, and was based on unsigned
statements of witnesses. Plaintiff claims that those witnesses denied
having given any such
were the
plaintiffs in O.S.no.133 / 1998 . In their written statement they
admitted the relationship with the plaintiffs. It was denied that ... injunctory reliefs.
The third and fourth defendant had filed an unsigned written
statement, however the trial court had taken the suit filed by the
fourth
25th November, 2013, within ten days from date. As the
written statement is unsigned, the same may be signed and re-verified within the
aforesaid
course of the arguments. The Tribunal had relied upon the unsigned documents, incorrect comparative statements and wrong facts submitted by the respondents without having given ... discriminatory treatment had been meted out on the basis of unsigned and incorrect statement without having any official stamp/seal in making an incorrect comparative
have perused the said
statements. The said statements per se do not find any malicious contents therein.
The said statements were made by the defendants ... Investigating
Officer. The said statements are yet to be tested in a trial. The said statements are
unsigned and the defendants