Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

under Section 161 Cr.P.C., which is an unsigned statement, cannot have any authenticity or evidentiary value. Because the said witness has not given

Singh had deposed in his examination in chief that he recorded the statement of the complainant Smt. Renu which was attested by him. Perusal ... nowhere it is clear whether it is signature or the said statement is unsigned. No reason has been mentioned why the said statement

have perused the said statements. The said statements per se do not find any malicious contents therein. The said statements were made by the defendants ... Investigating Officer. The said statements are yet to be tested in a trial. The said statements are unsigned and the defendants

tell by checking them from his statement of accounts. At this stage, witness has been confronted with the statement of accounts, to which ... issuing the cheque in question as blank unsigned cheque to the complainant for security purpose, in his statement under section 313 Cr.P.C. Accused

tell by checking them from his statement of accounts. At this stage, witness has been confronted with the statement of accounts, to which ... issuing the cheque in question as blank unsigned cheque to the complainant for security purpose, in his statement under section 313 Cr.P.C. Accused

complainant evidence was closed at request. 5. After that on 11.10.2012 the statement of accused was recorded U/s 313 Cr.P.C in which ... statement accused stated that he had no transaction with the complainant, infact he did not know the complainant and his entire unsigned cheque book

Complaint and Ex. CW1/I is statement of account. 5. I have heard the parties and perused the records. Accused has admitted that ... being unsigned. It is also argued that complainant is not licensed for doing finance business. 6. Accused in his statement

receipt of the notice sent to him. Coming to the point of unsigned complaint, this Court has perused the judicial file. It is correct that ... before the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Patiala; it was registered and the statement of the complainant was recorded as CW1. Even if the complaint

accused no.1, A.K. Roy, in his defence. 33. In her statement U/S 313 CrPC , accused no.2, Ms. Rupa Ghosh has denied ... relating to different categories are incomplete, unsigned and fabricated documents. Accused no.2, Ms. Rupa Ghosh has also denied the allegations that co­accused

accused. It would also be pertinent to peruse the following statements made by the complainant during his cross examination on 06.09.2012: 'My firm maintains ... averred: "it is correct that Ex. CW 1/B (colly) are unsigned. (Vol. However each of these bills contain the receipt