cognizance taken
of complaint on 16.03.2016 on unsigned affidavit purportedly filed
as a preliminary statement bad in law and quashed with further
order that permission ... holding the cognizance taken of complaint on
16.03.2016 on unsigned affidavit purportedlyfiled as a preliminary
statement bad in law and quashed with further order that
root of the case. The learned
Family court found that the statement of the respondent/husband (petitioner
in the HMA 16/1184) was recorded ... respondent/husband had re-
endorsed his statement on 30.5.2017 and had signed the same, which was
left inadvertently unsigned on 07.04.2014.
6. The learned Family
complainant
company. The accused has also not explained how the
alleged unsigned blank cheque came into the possession of
the complainant company. It is pertinent ... Thirdly, the complainant has produced Ex.P6
which is account statement of accused maintained by
16
complainant company
Digvijay Nath Tewari vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 12 February, 2020
Paresh Nathalal Chauhan vs State Of Gujarat on 5 May, 2020
Author: G.R.Udhwani
Nitin Sharma vs State on 6 February, 2020
Author: Rajnish Bhatnagar
Bench: Rajnish Bhatnagar
* IN
which are given by the accused during the course of
recording of statement U/s.313 of Cr.P.C . are
relevant here to consider ... forcibly collected by the
complainant in the police station and it was unsigned
blank cheque and same has been filled by the
complainant
Sri.G.M.Vijay Kumar vs Smt.G.A.Mangala on 23 January, 2020
IN
Aged About 68 Years vs Aged About 50 Years on 9 June, 2020
1
IN
Aged About 58 Years vs Aged About 50 Years on 9 June, 2020
1
IN
