clarify whether she had, as a
matter of fact, made such a statement before the Investigating
Officer or its occurrence was a mere contrivance ... face of previous statement attributed to PW-13 being
an unsigned statement. For reiteration, the relevant improved or
embellished portion having not been
that
they had abetted the activities. However, such was not the position;
statements of R.N. Zutshi, Dil Agha, Olga, and several other
individuals were ... Agha used No.9811158376. This
statement corroborated the statement of Dil Agha recorded on
23.05.2001. Dil Agha's unsigned statement was duly supported
station in Delhi and had been frequently touring. Earlier
an unsigned statement had been sent by the Company to the
petitioner and it had been
rejoinder and submitted
that the respondent has acknowledged the dues.
The statement of the account of the petitioner-
company dated 5.10.2012 was sent by respondent ... authority to
send such communication and the said document is
unsigned statement. However, the said dispute
raised by the respondent cannot be termed as
reasonable
clarify whether she had, as a
matter of fact, made such a statement before the Investigating
Officer or its occurrence was a mere contrivance ... face of previous statement attributed to PW-13 being
an unsigned statement. For reiteration, the relevant improved or
embellished portion having not been
submitted that the accused had handed
over an unsigned paper bearing statement of account and the accused agreed
seen that there is no date
put on the statement and also it was remained unsigned by the
AR of the claimant company ... affidavit. It is seen
that again the statement for tendering the affidavit was
remained unsigned and without any date. It is further seen that
after
above. Surprisingly, the claim is unsigned one. Upon
service of notice, management put in appearance and filed written
statement contesting the claim
plaintiff. Plaintiff has filed a
computer print out of statement of account to show the cash
payments against the Committee. I may point out that ... Section 65B of Indian Evidence Act. Further, it is unilateral
statement of account unsigned by the plaintiff and therefore
cannot be accepted. Defendant
defend was granted, written statement was filed by
Ravindra Dayal, the Petitioner herein which was subsequently amended. In
the written statement it was stated that ... Award dated 27th February, 1972 relied
upon by Shashi Mehra was unstamped, unsigned, unexecuted and
unregistered document thus non-est in law and does
