Srei Equipment Finance Ltd vs Md. Ali Kader Sekh on 30 January, 2019
filed a report. It appears from
the report that the receiver could not take possession of the
asset since the asset is untraceable. The report
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 214 (1.50 seconds)Tata Capital Financial Services ... vs S. Mukherjee & Anr on 16 June, 2015
16th June 2015.
Appearance:
Ms. Sneha Sharma, Advocate
...for the petitioner.
The report filed by the Receiver shows that the Agent
appointed by the Receiver ... take possession of the asset
in question. The said asset is untraceable. The report filed by
the Receiver is kept with the record.
While
Tata Capital Financial Services ... vs Rubu Construction & Anr on 9 June, 2015
Affidavit of service filed in Court is kept with the record.
The report filed by the receiver shows that the agent appointed by
the receiver ... possession of the said asset in question, as the
same is untraceable. The report records that the judgment debtors are willing
Tata Capital Financial Services ... vs Pradip Giri & Anr on 16 June, 2015
take possession
of the asset in question. The asset is untraceable. The report
filed by the Receiver is taken on record.
It appears that
Srei Equipment Finance Limited (Sefl) vs Sanjay Tulshiram Ghule & Anr on 3 December, 2015
possession of the asset in question as the
said asset is untraceable. The report of the Receiver is kept
with the record.
Under such circumstances
Tata Capital Financial Services ... vs Rajesh Sahani & Anr on 16 June, 2015
June 2015.
Appearance:
Ms. Sneha Sharma, Advocate
...for the decree holder.
The report filed by the Receiver shows that the Agent of the
Receiver could ... take possession of the asset in question. The
said asset is untraceable. The report filed by the Receiver is
kept with the record.
Since
Tata Capital Financial Services ... vs Rubu Construction & Anr on 9 June, 2015
spite of service, none appears on behalf of the judgment
debtors.
The report filed by the receiver shows that the agent appointed by
the receiver ... possession of the said asset in question, as the
same is untraceable. The report records that the judgment debtors are willing
L & T Finance Ltd vs Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sahu & Anr on 28 August, 2014
report of the Receiver shows that the said asset is
untraceable. The report also states that Mr. Sahu, the judgment debtor informed
the Receiver that
Magma Fincorp Limited vs Girish S & Anr on 12 August, 2014
vehicle could not be taken and the judgment-debtor is untraceable. The report states
that the Police Authorities informed the Receivers that the said judgment
Magma Fincorp Ltd vs Krishna Construction & Ors on 20 September, 2016
receiver could not take possession of the vehicle as it was
untraceable. The report is kept with the record.
Under such circumstances, there shall