property concerned, shall be the basis for fixation of the
upset price for the respective assets, may be in one lot or
different
premises by auction on 08.03.2002. In the said Proclamation, the upset price was fixed at Rs.92,70,000/-. Pursuant to the said Proclamation ... Special Recovery Officer for auctioning the premises on 27.09.2002 wherein the upset price of the premises was fixed at Rs.67,54,182/= instead
direction may kindly be issued,
directing revision / modification in the upset price and the EMD
fixed in the order at Annexure-A herein in terms ... upset price declared by OL is inadequate and undervalued and the
property in question is capable of fetching higher price therefore,
upset price fixed
High Court may be pleased to approve
the Upset Price and EMD Price for sale of the assets and
properties of the Company in liquidation ... Table-"A") of this report or such other upset
price, EMD, as may be considered appropriate by this
Hon'ble Court
property concerned,
shall be the basis for fixation of the upset price for
the respective assets, may be in one lot or different ... task of obtaining valuation reports for
the purpose of fixing upset price for different lots of properties and
inviting offers for sale. At different stages
Vasantiben Dhansukhbhai Desai Since ... vs The State Of Gujarat on 21 August, 2019
Equivalent citations
District Development Officer in connection with the fixing of upset price for the octroi contract to be given for the ensuing period. By letter dated ... octroi for a period of 2 years and to fix the upset price for the purpose. The upset price was to be fixed keeping
Notification for that purpose was published on 23.1.2004. The
upset price of the land was fixed at Rs.110/ per sq.mt. However,
nobody came ... auction of the land was
published on 25.6.2004 fixing the upset price of the land at Rs.364/
per sq.mt., but that point
year 1992. The public auction was held and the upset price in respect of these plots as was determined by the Deputy Town Planner ... Registrar. The petitioners herein paid the stamp duty at the upset price which was fixed and did not pay the stamp duty at the actual
submitted
that the respondent No.1 Trust has initially fixed the upset price
for sale of two lots of the property in question ... Lacs.
However, the upset price was subsequently reduced to Rs.67 Lacs.
This action on the part of the Trust is not justifiable