Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 5018 (1.19 seconds)

Malaiakkal vs Kandaswamy on 27 November, 2000

suit properties are described only as a common pathway, one party claiming them as common pathway and the other party is claiming them as exclusively ... When the appellants are claiming the right of pathway as a common pathway, as used by their ancestors for more than 50 years and they
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Malaiakkal vs Kandaswamy on 27 November, 2000

breadth as though they were being used as a regular pathway. The plaintiffs have never used the pathway for walking through the suit properties. Therefore ... When the appellants are claiming the right of pathway as a common pathway, as used by their ancestors for more than 50 years and they
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Johny vs Joseph on 15 January, 2001

appellant as to whether it is a public pathway or a pathway commonly used by the appellant and respondents. The trial court has noticed ... case of the plaintiff that the B schedule pathway is the pathway commonly used by the plaintiff and the defendants, it is not necessary
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next