held as under :-
"22. What is known as "useless formality theory" has received
consideration of this Court in M.C. Mehta ... authority to consider. Ackner, J. has
said that the 'useless formality theory' is a
dangerous one and, however inconvenient, natural
justice must
held as under :-
"22. What is known as "useless formality theory" has received
consideration of this Court in M.C. Mehta ... authority to consider.
Ackner, J. has said that the 'useless formality theory' is a dangerous
one and, however inconvenient, natural justice must
held as
under:-
22. What is known as "useless formality
theory" has received consideration of this Court in
M.C. Mehta v. Union ... authority to consider. Ackner, J. has said that
the 'useless formality theory' is a
dangerous one and, however inconvenient,
natural justice must
proceedings
are not terminated.
22. What is known as "useless formality
theory" has received consideration of this Court
in M.C. Mehta ... authority to consider. Ackner, J. has
said that the 'useless formality theory' is a
dangerous one and, however inconvenient,
natural justice must
held as
under:-
22. What is known as "useless formality theory"
has received consideration of this Court in M.C.
Mehta v. Union ... authority to consider.
Ackner, J. has said that the 'useless formality
theory' is a dangerous one and, however
14
inconvenient, natural justice must
terms of principles of natural justice do not improve the situation, ``useless formality theory'' can be pressed into service.
The Apex Court ... proceedings are not terminated.
17. What is known as `useless formality theory' has received consideration of this Court in M.C. Mehta v. Union
authority to consider. Ackner, J., has said that the "useless formality theory" is a dangerous one and, however inconvenient, natural justice must ... giving six reasons. A detailed and emphatic criticism of the 'useless formality theory' has been made much earlier in 'Natural Justice, Substance
held as under:-
"22. What is known as "useless formality theory" has
received consideration of this Court in M.C. Mehta ... authority to consider.
Ackner, J. has said that the 'useless formality theory'
is a dangerous one and, however inconvenient, natural
justice must
held as under :-
"22. What is known as "useless formality theory" has received
consideration of this Court in M.C. Mehta ... authority to consider.
Ackner, J. has said that the 'useless formality theory' is a dangerous
one and, however inconvenient, natural justice must
held as
under:-
"22. What is known as "useless formality theory"
has received consideration of this Court in M.C.
Mehta ... authority to consider.
Ackner, J. has said that the 'useless formality
theory' is a dangerous one and, however
inconvenient, natural justice must
