abusive language
seriously, he had enough time in between to think
23
over and reflect and, therefore, it cannot be said
that the abusive language ... abusive language seriously, he had
enough time in between to think over and reflect and therefore,
it could not be said that the abusive language
respondent no. 10 reached on the spot, the petitioner started using
abusive language. The Petitioner was in inebriated condition. The
Petitioner also pushed the respondent ... petitioner was having hot-talk with
respondent No.10. He also used abusive language and he also pushed
respondent No.10. Thereafter, respondent
use of abusive language there are no details about
the teachers against whom abusive language was used. She would
submit that similarly Charge ... teacher about collection of money.
39. On Charge No.6 of using abusive language, she submits that the
Management has relied upon 3 complaints
Singh being habitual absence without permission and
overstaying on leave and using abusive language or disturbing the peace
at the place of his employment ... disciplinary action
against him. This clearly establishes that the CO used abusive language
against the Manager and torn the Memo which was to be received
what, in the ordinary circumstances, would be the effect of the abusive language used and not what the complainant actually did as a result ... ordinary general nature of the abusive language that is the test for considering whether the abusive language is an intentional insult likely to provoke
alleged by the defendant Nos. 4 to 6 that plaintiff had used abusive
language against the defendant No. 6 on 04.06.2024 during the live telecast ... wherein the defendant No. 6 had falsely accused the plaintiff
of using abusive language against her during the telecast of India TV New
Channel held
enraged and abused him as well as his
wife and as the complainant told him not to use
abusive language, the applicant got enraged ... ordinary general nature of
the abusive language that is the test for
considering whether the abusive language is an
intentional insult likely to provoke
come at the place of
occurrence and he has alleged to use abusive language and
also gave threat to kill to the complainant as well ... ordinary general nature of the
abusive language that is the test for considering whether the
abusive language is an intentional insult likely to provoke
against applicant is only with respect to use of abusive language and threatening. The language used by applicant has not been stated by informant ... accompanied co-accused and have abused and threatned for life. The nature of abusive language alleged to have been used by applicant has not been
been made on telephone and secondly, the exact contents of the abusive language used by the revisionist has not been disclosed. In this regard, reference ... that the petitioner contacted the defacto complainant over phone and used abusive language. Even if the petitioner used abusive words over phone, that would