Search Results Page

Search Results

11 - 20 of 448 (0.94 seconds)

Shri S.K. Atrey vs The Secretary on 29 September, 2011

stipulation that vacancies could be increased. Before process was complete vacancies were increased from 15 to 33. Merit list was prepared of 66 candidates ... Supreme Court as follows:- It is a settled legal proposition that vacancies cannot be filled up over and above the number of vacancies advertised. Reference
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Unknown vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2011

Railway authorities in October 1984:- 1. Incorrect assessment of vacancies. 2. Increase in vacancies during the process of selection. 3. Administrative errors due to seniority ... also not a case where there had been any increase in the number of vacancies during the process of selection. The present is also
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Vaibhav Shrivastava vs Union Of India on 29 April, 2011

vacancies in the State of Chattisgarh, out of which there were 4 vacancies for allocation to outsider candidates and there was one vacancy ... supernumerary vacancy was created in Chattisgarh cadre without disturbing the allocation made to others. It was further decided that one vacancy would be increased
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   1 2   3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next