dispute which might arise as between themselves t
he
agreement would be valid. If such a contract is clea
r,
unambiguous and explicit ... dispute which might arise
as
between themselves the agreement would be valid. If such
a
contract is clear, unambiguous and explicit and not vague
clause would not make it an agreement, for which both the parties must agree. An agreement is valid when it is, by the two parties ... then, such an agreement cannot be presumed. Prior to the enactment of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1940 even oral agreements were valid. This position
abide by the statement of a person, it is a valid agreement enforceable by the Court except when there are sufficient reasons for resiling from ... Arbitration Act but the agreement of the parties themselves. If the agreement is valid, the Court has a power under its inherent jurisdiction to give
Sharma was entitled to get a valid sale deed executed in his favour under his valid agreement. The sale deed executed in favour ... agreement dated 10-1-1966. That agreement was never cancelled. Plaintiff-respondent Sri C. K. Sharma had full knowledge of the said agreement. The agreement
that it be declared (a) that there does not exist valid, subsisting arbitration agreement between the applicant and first respondent ; (b) that the 2nd respondent ... Arbitration Act, where a contention was raised that there was no valid arbitration agreement between the parties as there was no concluded contract between
dispute which might arise
as between themselves the agreement would be valid. If such a
contract is clear, unambiguous and explicit and not vague ... agreement opted
for jurisdiction of a particular Court excluding other Courts and if
that Court had jurisdiction, such an agreement would be legal and
valid
following issues were framed :
"1. Whether there was a valid arbitration agreement between the parties ?
2.Is the award liable to be set aside
Contract Act . Normally the courts will have to enforce all valid and lawful agreements. In my opinion, if the excluded court finds that there ... valid ouster clause in the agreement but the court has been moved in breach of it, the excluded court should not exercise its jurisdiction
plaintiff. However, in view of the fact
that the said Agreement was valid for a period of three years and that
further orders were contemplated ... dispute which might arise as between
themselves, such agreement would be valid and binding.
We, therefore, find that prima facie, the learned Single Judge
filling station. The agreement for sale was made subject to the condition that the defendants would enter into a supplemental agreement with the plaintiff ... plaintiff brought an action claiming a declaration that the petrol agreement was valid and binding and an injunction. The court held that there must
