plot to
the prejudice of the plaintiff and to make a valid offer to the plaintiff in
respect of the said plot for construction ... price of the plot
from the date of deposit till the valid offer of possession. The case of the
plaintiff was that by virtue
HEREIN TO OTHER INSTITUTIONS RECOGNIZED BY R-2 AND 4,
4
OFFERING VALID DEGREE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES/MEDICINE
WITHIN THE STATE OF KARNATAKA FROM ... PETITIONERS
HEREIN TO OTHER INSTITUTIONS RECOGNIZED BY R-2 AND 5,
OFFERING VALID DEGREE IN MEDICAL SCIENCE/MEDICINE
WITHIN THE STATE OF KARNATAKA FROM
Exhibit No.1 cannot be construed to be a valid offer for sale of the said flat,
as it does not contain the terms ... that in every contract for sale there must be a valid offer. The letter dated
25.05.1988 which is marked as exhibit 1 can hardly
taking the shops on lease/licence basis must
be a valid offer. Admittedly, as on date of auction, the shops were still
under the occupation ... offer to be valid, it must be
clearly communicated, giving the offeree a chance to accept or reject. A
valid offer can be made
taking the shops on lease/licence basis must
be a valid offer. Admittedly, as on date of auction, the shops were still
under the occupation ... offer to be valid, it must be
clearly communicated, giving the offeree a chance to accept or reject. A
valid offer can be made
Similar is the position when the offer is made under sub - section (4). If the offer so not valid there is nothing for the Magistrate ... husbands offer and wife refusal to live with her husband offer account of the remarriage would be to hold that there was no valid offer
been asserted that the same was not a valid offer and he came only after finalization of the deal by the respondent and even after ... writing letters to the Head Office and since there was no valid offer, there was no question of any consideration being given to the claim
offer was accepted, as stated hereinabove,
the validity of the bid/offer of this appellant was extended lastly up to
10th April, 2012 and offer ... offer cannot be resulted into
a valid contract because there was no valid acceptance of the offer at
all on 12th April, 2012. The offer
under consideration and the plaintiff was directed to
re-validate its offer till 30.04.2004. According to the plaintiff in view of
the acceptance ... offer on 12.05.2003, the MIDC was not justified in
stating that the offer made by it should be re-validated. There was
exchange of communication
offer dated 6th April, 1990 and the offer
dated 5th March, 1990 was superseded by the revised offer
dated 6th April, 1990. The revised offer ... offer was subject
to receipt of order prior to 31.3.90 and the letter dated
6.4.90 sent by the petitioner stated that the offer was
valid
