complainants submitted that the letter dated 10.06.2017 cannot be treated as valid offer of possession. Possession was validly offered through letter dated 07.01.2020 as such ... deposit of illegal demand, as such, it cannot be held as valid offer of possession as held by Supreme Court in Utpal Trehan
contractually bound to pay, cannot be considered to be a valid offer of possession. Moreover, no offer for possession was made in the possession letter ... final demand notice dated 25.03.2017 cannot be considered to be a valid offer of possession.
8. Since no valid offer of possession of the flat
complainant, vide letter dated 21.2.2014 Ex.OP-1/5 was a valid offer? That very letter was proved by the complainant on the record ... that work. Therefore, it cannot be said that it was a valid offer of possession. It is pertinent to note that after receiving that letter
this Hon'ble Court rather than demanding directly, for offering valid possession as per the Buyer's Agreement, and the same may considered ... this Hon'ble Court rather than demanding directly, for offering valid possession as per the Buyer's Agreement, and the same
project. As such offer of fit out possession is not a valid offer of possession. Supreme Court in Wg Cdr Arifur Rahman Khan ... Supreme Court in M.K. Gupta (supra), the absence of a valid offer of possession constitutes a continuing cause of action. The complaint is therefore
project. As such offer of fit out possession is not a valid offer of possession. Supreme Court in Wg Cdr Arifur Rahman Khan ... Supreme Court in M.K. Gupta (supra), the absence of a valid offer of possession constitutes a continuing cause of action. The complaint is therefore
project. As such offer of fit out possession is not a valid offer of possession. Supreme Court in Wg Cdr Arifur Rahman Khan ... Supreme Court in M.K. Gupta (supra), the absence of a valid offer of possession constitutes a continuing cause of action. The complaint is therefore
Partial Completion Certificate and therefore, does not constitute a valid offer of possession as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court Samruddhi ... offer of possession dated 07.08.2012 cannot be considered to be a valid offer. At best, the offer of possession could have been issued only
offer of possession dated 17.03.2017 cannot be considered to be a valid offer.
22. It is also contended by the complainant, on the basis ... valid offer.
23. The complainant's case is that the offer of possession dated 1.03.2017 was not a valid offer since there were several
offer of possession without completing the development work, is not a valid offer of possession. In other words, Complainant cannot raise construction without having ... possession without first completing the development works is not a valid offer of possession. The Complainant claimed possession of the plot after completion
